PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUGT vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUGT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUGT achieves a -16.05% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, NUGT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -8.54%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


NUGT

1D
-6.64%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
-16.05%
6M
-6.29%
1Y
97.46%
3Y*
60.96%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
-8.54%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUGT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
-16.05%425.05%2.89%2.60%-32.10%-26.31%-60.16%100.73%-44.52%3.73%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between NUGT and QQQ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010

0.16

The correlation between NUGT and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NUGT vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUGT
QQQ

Basic Materials

100.0%
1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Basic Materials

NUGT
100.0%
QQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

NUGT

-

QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

NUGT

-

QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

NUGT

-

QQQ
7.7%

Energy

NUGT

-

QQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

NUGT

-

QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

NUGT

-

QQQ
4.2%

Industrials

NUGT

-

QQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

NUGT

-

QQQ
0.1%

Technology

NUGT

-

QQQ
53.8%

Utilities

NUGT

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUGT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUGT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUGTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.51

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

13.49

-9.31

NUGT vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUGT and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUGTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.64

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.81

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

0.99

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

0.41

-0.74

Drawdowns

NUGT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUGT drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGT and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUGTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-82.97%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.58%

-11.96%

-41.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.58%

-22.77%

-30.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

-35.12%

-38.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

-35.12%

-61.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.80%

-0.26%

-99.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.52%

-32.79%

-58.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.39%

3.11%

+20.28%

Volatility

NUGT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) has a higher volatility of 30.32% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that NUGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUGTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.32%

4.49%

+25.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.18%

12.10%

+63.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.01%

15.94%

+74.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.96%

22.38%

+49.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.90%

22.29%

+65.61%

NUGT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUGT has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUGT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
0.36%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUGT and QQQ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUGT has higher volatility (30.32%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGT dropped -99.97% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.94% vs -8.54% for NUGT. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.94% return vs -8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for NUGT.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.36% for NUGT.

NUGT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. NUGT tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (300%), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.23% for NUGT and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUGT and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer