NUGT vs. ERX
NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - NUGT is a Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%), while ERX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NUGT returned -14.42%/yr vs -9.16%/yr for ERX. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NUGT charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for ERX.
Performance
NUGT vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUGT achieves a -33.26% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 64.87% return. Over the past 10 years, NUGT has underperformed ERX with an annualized return of -14.42%, while ERX has yielded a comparatively higher -9.16% annualized return.
NUGT
- 1D
- 4.91%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- 6M
- -47.01%
- YTD
- -33.26%
- 1Y
- 50.44%
- 3Y*
- 56.79%
- 5Y*
- 17.00%
- 10Y*
- -14.42%
- ALL TIME*
- -33.40%
ERX
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 19.48%
- 6M
- 24.53%
- YTD
- 64.87%
- 1Y
- 80.43%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 35.08%
- 10Y*
- -9.16%
- ALL TIME*
- -7.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.67M | $22.94M | $27.89M | |
| $68.86M | $69.27M | $87.33M |
NUGT vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -33.26% | 425.05% | 2.89% | 2.60% | -32.10% | -26.31% | -60.16% | 100.73% | -44.52% | 3.73% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 64.87% | 2.79% | 1.09% | -12.26% | 130.58% | 111.91% | -91.60% | 17.13% | -55.94% | -11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUGT and ERX is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010 | 0.19 |
The correlation between NUGT and ERX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NUGT vs. ERX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NUGT
ERX
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
NUGT
ERX
-
Communication Services
NUGT
-
ERX
-
Consumer Cyclical
NUGT
-
ERX
-
Consumer Defensive
NUGT
-
ERX
-
Energy
NUGT
-
ERX
Financial Services
NUGT
-
ERX
-
Healthcare
NUGT
-
ERX
-
Industrials
NUGT
-
ERX
-
Real Estate
NUGT
-
ERX
-
Technology
NUGT
-
ERX
-
Utilities
NUGT
-
ERX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUGT vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
NUGT
ERX
NUGT vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUGT | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.29 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 2.70 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | 6.81 | -5.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUGT vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUGT drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, roughly equal to the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGT and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUGT | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -99.54% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.40% | -29.97% | -37.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.40% | -42.34% | -25.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.72% | -46.90% | -26.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.89% | -98.59% | +1.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.84% | -91.68% | -8.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.59% | -67.25% | -24.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.06% | 11.84% | +22.22% |
Volatility
NUGT vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) has a higher volatility of 24.55% compared to Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) at 12.50%. This indicates that NUGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUGT | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.55% | 12.50% | +12.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.17% | 33.60% | +41.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.19% | 42.22% | +53.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.70% | 51.44% | +22.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.37% | 68.84% | +18.53% |
NUGT vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUGT has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than ERX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUGT vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than ERX's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.55% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 0.59% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUGT and ERX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUGT has higher volatility (24.55%) compared to ERX (12.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGT dropped -99.97% vs ERX's -99.54%.
On 10-year performance, ERX leads with -9.16% vs -14.42% for NUGT. On fees, ERX is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, ERX has been the lower-risk option at 12.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ERX has performed better with a -9.16% return vs -14.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ERX is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.
ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.59% for NUGT.
NUGT is categorized as Gold, while ERX is Energy Equities. NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%), while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.13% for NUGT and 0.91% for ERX.
ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUGT and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer