NUBD vs. BIV
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (BIV).
NUBD and BIV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUBD is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Aggregate ESG Select Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2017. BIV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 5. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both NUBD and BIV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NUBD or BIV.
Key characteristics
| NUBD | BIV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -1.49% | -1.21% |
| 1Y Return | 1.61% | 1.64% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.03% | -2.91% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.15% | 0.54% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.74% | 6.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.45% | -18.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -12.66% | -11.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUBD and BIV is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
NUBD vs. BIV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NUBD achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than BIV's -1.21% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUBD vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUBD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NUBD vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NUBD vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison
NUBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than BIV's 3.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUBD Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.26% | 2.99% | 2.83% | 2.05% | 2.21% | 2.67% | 3.08% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF | 3.42% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 2.38% | 3.02% | 3.96% | 4.22% |
Drawdowns
NUBD vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUBD drawdown since its inception was -19.45%, roughly equal to the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUBD and BIV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NUBD vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) is 1.29%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (BIV) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that NUBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.