NTTYY vs. CRWD
NTTYY (Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR) and CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. NTTYY operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, NTTYY returned -2.15%/yr vs 29.29%/yr for CRWD. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTTYY vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTTYY achieves a -8.45% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 59.49% return.
NTTYY
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -8.45%
- 6M
- -7.41%
- 1Y
- -16.62%
- 3Y*
- -6.35%
- 5Y*
- -2.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
CRWD
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- 59.32%
- YTD
- 59.49%
- 6M
- 42.63%
- 1Y
- 52.96%
- 3Y*
- 70.32%
- 5Y*
- 29.29%
- 10Y*
- —
NTTYY vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTTYY Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR | -8.45% | 2.79% | -16.66% | 7.84% | 3.06% | 8.63% | 1.78% | 9.14% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 59.49% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -14.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTTYY and CRWD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
NTTYY:
$74.14B
CRWD:
$192.98B
NTTYY:
$320.51
CRWD:
-$0.72
NTTYY:
0.01
CRWD:
39.33
NTTYY:
0.01
CRWD:
43.58
NTTYY:
$14.61T
CRWD:
$4.81B
NTTYY:
$2.67T
CRWD:
$3.60B
NTTYY:
$3.73T
CRWD:
-$39.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTTYY vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
NTTYY
CRWD
NTTYY vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR (NTTYY) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTTYY | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.23 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 1.43 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.62 | 3.29 | -4.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTTYY | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 | 1.19 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.58 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.79 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
NTTYY vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTTYY drawdown since its inception was -63.81%, smaller than the maximum CRWD drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTTYY and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTTYY | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.81% | -67.69% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.75% | -37.18% | +19.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | -44.44% | +15.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.20% | -67.69% | +38.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.33% | -4.42% | -21.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.02% | -23.66% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.30% | 16.14% | -5.84% |
Volatility
NTTYY vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR (NTTYY) is 4.84%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 15.34%. This indicates that NTTYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTTYY | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 15.34% | -10.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | 36.18% | -23.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 44.66% | -27.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 50.73% | -32.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 55.95% | -35.64% |
Dividends
NTTYY vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
Neither NTTYY nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTTYY Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR | 0.00% | 1.77% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 3.52% | 2.53% | 2.63% | 1.94% |
Financials
NTTYY vs. CRWD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NTTYY vs. CRWD - Profitability Comparison
NTTYY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR reported a gross profit of 559.59B and revenue of 4.06T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.
CRWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 989.46M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.8%.
NTTYY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR reported an operating income of 387.88B and revenue of 4.06T, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.
CRWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.90M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.
NTTYY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR reported a net income of 113.01B and revenue of 4.06T, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
CRWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 38.69M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTTYY and CRWD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWD has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to NTTYY (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTTYY dropped -63.81% vs CRWD's -67.69%.
CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTTYY and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer