PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTTYY vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTTYY vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR (NTTYY) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTTYY achieves a -11.63% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, NTTYY has underperformed BIL with an annualized return of 1.63%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively higher 2.20% annualized return.


NTTYY

1D
-0.04%
1M
-7.48%
YTD
-11.63%
6M
-10.88%
1Y
-13.82%
3Y*
-6.93%
5Y*
-2.50%
10Y*
1.63%

BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTTYY vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTTYY
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR
-11.63%2.79%-16.66%7.84%3.06%8.63%1.78%26.78%-11.25%15.27%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.67%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NTTYY and BIL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTTYY vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTTYY
NTTYY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
NTTYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTTYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTTYY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NTTYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTTYY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTTYY vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR (NTTYY) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTTYYBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-20.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-173.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

87.16

-86.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

352.24

-352.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.26

2,793.11

-2,794.37

NTTYY vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTTYY Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTTYY and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTTYY vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTTYY drawdown since its inception was -63.81%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTTYY and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTTYYBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.81%

-0.78%

-63.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.61%

-0.01%

-20.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.20%

-0.01%

-29.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.20%

-0.09%

-29.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

-0.21%

-29.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.88%

0.00%

-28.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.03%

-0.26%

-22.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.95%

0.00%

+10.95%

Volatility

NTTYY vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR (NTTYY) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that NTTYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTTYYBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

0.07%

+4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

0.14%

+12.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.10%

0.20%

+16.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.15%

0.26%

+17.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

0.26%

+20.05%

Dividends

NTTYY vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

NTTYY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
NTTYY
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp ADR
0.00%1.77%1.73%0.00%0.00%1.83%0.00%1.71%3.52%2.53%2.63%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTTYY and BIL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTTYY has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTTYY dropped -63.81% vs BIL's -0.78%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.32 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTTYY and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer