PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSI vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSI vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.


NTSI

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.92%
YTD
7.18%
6M
8.77%
1Y
20.90%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSI vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
7.18%30.37%1.11%15.42%-19.27%1.76%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSI and SCHD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.62

The correlation between NTSI and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NTSI vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NTSI
SCHD

Financial Services

25.0%
9.3%

Industrials

17.5%
7.5%

Technology

10.6%
16.4%

Healthcare

10.5%
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
19.2%

Basic Materials

6.7%
1.2%

Energy

4.8%
16.2%

Communication Services

4.7%
6.3%

Utilities

3.2%
0.0%

Real Estate

1.5%

-

Financial Services

NTSI
25.0%
SCHD
9.3%

Industrials

NTSI
17.5%
SCHD
7.5%

Technology

NTSI
10.6%
SCHD
16.4%

Healthcare

NTSI
10.5%
SCHD
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

NTSI
8.1%
SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

NTSI
7.4%
SCHD
19.2%

Basic Materials

NTSI
6.7%
SCHD
1.2%

Energy

NTSI
4.8%
SCHD
16.2%

Communication Services

NTSI
4.7%
SCHD
6.3%

Utilities

NTSI
3.2%
SCHD
0.0%

Real Estate

NTSI
1.5%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSI vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSI
NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSI vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSISCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

5.91

-4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

14.53

-8.31

NTSI vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSI and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSISCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.49

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.58

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.86

-0.48

Drawdowns

NTSI vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSISCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-33.37%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-4.61%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-16.13%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.01%

-16.85%

-17.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-1.40%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-3.32%

-5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

1.88%

+1.49%

Volatility

NTSI vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that NTSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSISCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

2.66%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

7.66%

+4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.95%

10.96%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

14.38%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

16.72%

-1.09%

NTSI vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NTSI vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
3.51%3.65%2.92%2.35%2.66%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSI and SCHD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSI has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSI dropped -34.01% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, SCHD leads with 8.36% vs 5.55% for NTSI. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 8.36% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NTSI.

NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 3.26% for SCHD.

NTSI is categorized as Global Allocation, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSI and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer