NTSI vs. QQQ

In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -0.51% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NTSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSI and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NTSI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.

The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) is 3.76%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that NTSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.