NTR vs. VTV
NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) is a stock, while VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Over the past 5 years, NTR returned 4.93%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for VTV. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTR vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NTR having a 12.29% return and VTV slightly higher at 12.30%.
NTR
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 16.39%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
NTR vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 12.29% | 43.33% | -16.97% | -20.19% | 0.23% | 60.78% | 5.60% | 5.57% | -11.36% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 12.30% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTR and VTV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2018 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NTR and VTV has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTR vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
NTR
VTV
NTR vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTR | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.47 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 4.15 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.46 | 15.69 | -13.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTR | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 2.61 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.81 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.51 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
NTR vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTR drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, roughly equal to the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTR and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTR | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.80% | -59.27% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.01% | -6.35% | -11.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.82% | -14.52% | -18.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.80% | -17.04% | -40.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.13% | 0.00% | -30.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.17% | -7.87% | -18.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.82% | 1.68% | +6.14% |
Volatility
NTR vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) has a higher volatility of 11.01% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that NTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTR | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.01% | 2.52% | +8.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.52% | 7.55% | +17.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.53% | 10.11% | +21.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.18% | 13.88% | +20.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.98% | 16.67% | +17.31% |
Dividends
NTR vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 3.18% | 3.53% | 4.83% | 3.76% | 3.51% | 2.45% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 3.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTR and VTV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTR has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTR dropped -57.80% vs VTV's -59.27%.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTR and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer