NTLA vs. VGT
NTLA (Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, NTLA returned -5.06%/yr vs 24.06%/yr for VGT. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NTLA vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTLA achieves a 18.80% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NTLA has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of -5.06%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.06% annualized return.
NTLA
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -39.18%
- 6M
- -18.78%
- YTD
- 18.80%
- 1Y
- -7.05%
- 3Y*
- -36.11%
- 5Y*
- -40.39%
- 10Y*
- -5.06%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.82%
VGT
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 21.30%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 34.81%
- 3Y*
- 26.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 24.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.16M | $55.27M | $78.35M | |
| $440.89M | $515.41M | $573.34M |
NTLA vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | 18.80% | -22.90% | -61.76% | -12.61% | -70.49% | 117.35% | 270.82% | 7.47% | -28.98% | 46.61% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 20.36% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTLA and VGT is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2016 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTLA vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
NTLA
VGT
NTLA vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTLA | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.23 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 1.94 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 5.23 | -5.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTLA vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTLA drawdown since its inception was -96.45%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTLA and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTLA | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.45% | -54.63% | -41.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.27% | -16.40% | -54.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.31% | -27.23% | -57.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.45% | -35.07% | -61.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.45% | -35.07% | -61.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.96% | -9.93% | -84.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.56% | -7.95% | -49.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.81% | 6.07% | +42.74% |
Volatility
NTLA vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) has a higher volatility of 18.85% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 8.42%. This indicates that NTLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTLA | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.85% | 8.42% | +10.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.80% | 20.14% | +36.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.08% | 24.28% | +73.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.01% | 25.83% | +52.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.82% | 24.89% | +53.93% |
Dividends
NTLA vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
NTLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTLA and VGT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTLA has higher volatility (18.85%) compared to VGT (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTLA dropped -96.45% vs VGT's -54.63%.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTLA and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer