PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTLA vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTLA vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTLA achieves a 69.63% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, NTLA has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of -5.26%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.49% annualized return.


NTLA

1D
-3.17%
1M
21.03%
YTD
69.63%
6M
61.89%
1Y
65.22%
3Y*
-28.07%
5Y*
-29.38%
10Y*
-5.26%

VGT

1D
-3.68%
1M
0.28%
YTD
23.32%
6M
21.50%
1Y
46.82%
3Y*
30.13%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
25.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTLA vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
69.63%-22.90%-61.76%-12.61%-70.49%117.35%270.82%7.47%-28.98%46.61%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
23.32%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between NTLA and VGT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2016

0.43

The correlation between NTLA and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTLA vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTLA
NTLA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NTLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTLA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
NTLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTLA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTLA vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTLAVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.87

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.41

8.76

-7.35

NTLA vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTLA Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTLA and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTLA vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTLA drawdown since its inception was -96.45%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTLA and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTLAVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.45%

-54.63%

-41.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.27%

-16.40%

-54.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.28%

-27.23%

-59.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.45%

-35.07%

-61.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.45%

-35.07%

-61.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.37%

-7.71%

-83.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.19%

-7.95%

-49.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.34%

5.36%

+40.98%

Volatility

NTLA vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) has a higher volatility of 29.47% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 11.39%. This indicates that NTLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTLAVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.47%

11.39%

+18.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.34%

18.58%

+39.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.89%

22.72%

+76.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.41%

25.55%

+55.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.80%

24.77%

+54.03%

Dividends

NTLA vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

NTLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTLA and VGT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTLA has higher volatility (29.47%) compared to VGT (11.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTLA dropped -96.45% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTLA and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer