PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSRGY vs. UL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NSRGY vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nestlé S.A. (NSRGY) and The Unilever Group (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSRGY achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -13.97% return. Over the past 10 years, NSRGY has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 6.02%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.99% annualized return.


NSRGY

1D
-0.94%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
2.93%
6M
3.74%
1Y
-3.56%
3Y*
-3.52%
5Y*
-1.97%
10Y*
6.02%

UL

1D
-0.40%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
-13.97%
6M
-15.83%
1Y
-18.94%
3Y*
2.44%
5Y*
-0.68%
10Y*
3.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSRGY vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSRGY
Nestlé S.A.
2.93%24.80%-27.05%2.88%-15.94%22.32%11.63%37.26%-2.74%27.45%
UL
The Unilever Group
-13.97%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%

Correlation

The correlation between NSRGY and UL is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007

0.51

The correlation between NSRGY and UL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NSRGY:

$251.95B

UL:

$121.42B

EPS

NSRGY:

$7.72

UL:

$5.06

PE Ratio

NSRGY:

12.65

UL:

10.92

PS Ratio

NSRGY:

1.39

UL:

1.18

PB Ratio

NSRGY:

7.67

UL:

7.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

NSRGY:

$181.02B

UL:

$109.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NSRGY:

$83.86B

UL:

$90.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

NSRGY:

$36.34B

UL:

$24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSRGY vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSRGY
NSRGY Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NSRGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSRGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSRGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
NSRGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSRGY Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSRGY vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nestlé S.A. (NSRGY) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSRGYULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.16

-0.91

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.07

-1.19

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.86

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

-0.76

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.37

-1.63

+1.26

NSRGY vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSRGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is higher than the UL Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSRGY and UL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSRGYULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

-0.91

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

-0.03

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.19

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.39

-0.26

Drawdowns

NSRGY vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSRGY drawdown since its inception was -75.68%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSRGY and UL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSRGYULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.68%

-53.55%

-22.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.11%

-25.09%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.79%

-25.09%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.24%

-26.53%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.24%

-30.13%

-8.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.38%

-24.57%

+5.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-10.60%

-13.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.57%

11.65%

-2.08%

Volatility

NSRGY vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

Nestlé S.A. (NSRGY) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to The Unilever Group (UL) at 5.31%. This indicates that NSRGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSRGYULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

5.31%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

17.91%

-3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.76%

21.00%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.87%

20.78%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

21.59%

-3.15%

Dividends

NSRGY vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

NSRGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, which matches UL's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NSRGY
Nestlé S.A.
4.10%3.44%4.01%2.86%2.57%2.18%2.34%2.28%3.12%5.64%6.54%3.13%
UL
The Unilever Group
4.12%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

NSRGY vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nestlé S.A. and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
44.89B
18.38B
(NSRGY) Total Revenue
(UL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NSRGY vs. UL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nestlé S.A. and The Unilever Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
44.6%
0
Portfolio components
NSRGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nestlé S.A. reported a gross profit of 20.01B and revenue of 44.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.

UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NSRGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nestlé S.A. reported an operating income of 6.93B and revenue of 44.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

NSRGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nestlé S.A. reported a net income of 3.94B and revenue of 44.89B, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NSRGY and UL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSRGY has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to UL (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSRGY dropped -75.68% vs UL's -53.55%.

NSRGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSRGY and UL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer