PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSRGY vs. UL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NSRGY vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nestlé S.A. (NSRGY) and Unilever PLC (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSRGY achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, NSRGY has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 5.64%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.32% annualized return.


NSRGY

1D
-2.42%
1M
-5.21%
6M
9.47%
YTD
5.35%
1Y
19.17%
3Y*
-3.10%
5Y*
-1.67%
10Y*
5.64%
ALL TIME*
3.13%

UL

1D
-2.85%
1M
1.49%
6M
-5.64%
YTD
-1.37%
1Y
-3.63%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
5.32%
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$45.70M$48.16M$45.78M
$387.98M$308.85M$260.04M

NSRGY vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSRGY
Nestlé S.A.
5.35%24.80%-27.05%2.88%-15.94%22.32%11.63%37.26%-2.74%27.45%
UL
Unilever PLC
-1.37%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%

Correlation

The correlation between NSRGY and UL is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.51

The correlation between NSRGY and UL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NSRGY:

$257.07B

UL:

$136.60B

EPS

NSRGY:

CHF 6.90

UL:

€5.38

PE Ratio

NSRGY:

11.67

UL:

10.22

PS Ratio

NSRGY:

1.15

UL:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

NSRGY:

CHF 179.82B

UL:

€111.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NSRGY:

CHF 82.84B

UL:

€111.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

NSRGY:

CHF 35.74B

UL:

€24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSRGY vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NSRGY
NSRGY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NSRGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSRGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSRGY Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NSRGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSRGY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NSRGY vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nestlé S.A. (NSRGY) and Unilever PLC (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NSRGYULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.02

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

-0.01

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

-0.02

+2.98

NSRGY vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSRGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the UL Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSRGY and UL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NSRGY vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSRGY drawdown since its inception was -75.68%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSRGY and UL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSRGYULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.68%

-53.55%

-22.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.10%

-25.09%

+10.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.98%

-25.09%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.24%

-25.09%

-13.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.24%

-30.13%

-8.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.49%

-13.52%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-10.63%

-13.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

13.47%

-6.81%

Volatility

NSRGY vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nestlé S.A. (NSRGY) is 9.81%, while Unilever PLC (UL) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that NSRGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSRGYULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

11.44%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.13%

19.70%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.21%

24.32%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.39%

21.32%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.59%

21.76%

-3.17%

Dividends

NSRGY vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

NSRGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than UL's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NSRGY
Nestlé S.A.
4.01%3.44%4.01%2.86%2.57%2.18%2.34%2.28%3.12%5.64%6.54%3.13%
UL
Unilever PLC
3.60%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

NSRGY vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nestlé S.A. and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NSRGY and UL have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UL has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to NSRGY (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSRGY dropped -75.68% vs UL's -53.55%.

NSRGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSRGY and UL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer