PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSEPX vs. ALBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSEPX vs. ALBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Fund (NSEPX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSEPX achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly lower than ALBAX's 12.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NSEPX having a 15.27% annualized return and ALBAX not far ahead at 15.66%.


NSEPX

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.62%
YTD
8.07%
6M
7.14%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
15.27%

ALBAX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.60%
YTD
12.60%
6M
11.77%
1Y
32.06%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
15.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSEPX vs. ALBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSEPX
Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Fund
8.07%14.12%24.24%28.34%-19.38%29.92%19.60%28.76%-5.67%24.44%
ALBAX
Alger Growth & Income Fund
12.60%19.89%21.81%22.60%-14.12%30.79%15.22%28.92%-4.72%20.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NSEPX and ALBAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 1998

0.95

The correlation between NSEPX and ALBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSEPX vs. ALBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSEPX
NSEPX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NSEPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSEPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSEPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NSEPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSEPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

ALBAX
ALBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ALBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ALBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSEPX vs. ALBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Fund (NSEPX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NSEPXALBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.47

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

4.21

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.38

18.59

-8.22

NSEPX vs. ALBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSEPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the ALBAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSEPX and ALBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NSEPX vs. ALBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSEPX drawdown since its inception was -52.50%, which is greater than ALBAX's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSEPX and ALBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSEPXALBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.50%

-40.56%

-11.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-7.86%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.19%

-17.65%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

-22.06%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-34.26%

+0.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-1.09%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-7.33%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

1.78%

+0.66%

Volatility

NSEPX vs. ALBAX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Fund (NSEPX) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) at 4.33%. This indicates that NSEPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSEPXALBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

4.33%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

9.73%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

12.58%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

15.58%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

17.29%

+0.95%

NSEPX vs. ALBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSEPX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ALBAX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSEPX vs. ALBAX - Dividend Comparison

NSEPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than ALBAX's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALBAX
Alger Growth & Income Fund
0.72%0.74%1.08%0.98%1.24%4.17%2.55%5.00%6.75%2.35%1.56%3.75%
NSEPX
Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Fund
6.47%3.02%6.28%4.88%6.25%7.45%7.13%5.16%11.11%5.57%2.18%12.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, NSEPX and ALBAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NSEPX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to ALBAX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSEPX dropped -52.50% vs ALBAX's -40.56%.

ALBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSEPX and ALBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer