PortfoliosLab logo
NSA vs. CUBE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NSA and CUBE is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NSA vs. CUBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) and CubeSmart (CUBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NSA:

0.15

CUBE:

0.21

Sortino Ratio

NSA:

0.50

CUBE:

0.61

Omega Ratio

NSA:

1.06

CUBE:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

NSA:

0.14

CUBE:

0.25

Martin Ratio

NSA:

0.39

CUBE:

0.53

Ulcer Index

NSA:

15.39%

CUBE:

14.86%

Daily Std Dev

NSA:

28.09%

CUBE:

24.86%

Max Drawdown

NSA:

-55.05%

CUBE:

-93.15%

Current Drawdown

NSA:

-37.51%

CUBE:

-18.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NSA:

$5.39B

CUBE:

$9.78B

EPS

NSA:

$0.61

CUBE:

$1.69

PE Ratio

NSA:

60.07

CUBE:

25.25

PEG Ratio

NSA:

3.14

CUBE:

6.31

PS Ratio

NSA:

7.27

CUBE:

9.05

PB Ratio

NSA:

4.04

CUBE:

3.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

NSA:

$762.54M

CUBE:

$1.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NSA:

$558.67M

CUBE:

$703.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

NSA:

$393.00M

CUBE:

$695.30M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSA achieves a -2.76% return, which is significantly lower than CUBE's 2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, NSA has outperformed CUBE with an annualized return of 15.81%, while CUBE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.


NSA

YTD

-2.76%

1M

5.10%

6M

-13.50%

1Y

4.28%

5Y*

12.68%

10Y*

15.81%

CUBE

YTD

2.67%

1M

13.87%

6M

-9.39%

1Y

5.23%

5Y*

17.10%

10Y*

10.06%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NSA vs. CUBE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NSA is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NSA is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NSA is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NSA is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NSA is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NSA is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CUBE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CUBE is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CUBE is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NSA vs. CUBE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) and CubeSmart (CUBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is comparable to the CUBE Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSA and CUBE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NSA vs. CUBE - Dividend Comparison

NSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, more than CUBE's 4.80% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NSA
National Storage Affiliates Trust
6.23%5.94%5.38%5.95%2.30%3.75%3.78%4.38%3.82%3.99%3.15%0.00%
CUBE
CubeSmart
4.80%3.57%4.27%4.42%2.55%3.96%4.10%4.25%3.84%3.36%2.25%2.49%

Drawdowns

NSA vs. CUBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSA drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, smaller than the maximum CUBE drawdown of -93.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSA and CUBE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NSA vs. CUBE - Volatility Comparison

National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to CubeSmart (CUBE) at 7.75%. This indicates that NSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NSA vs. CUBE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National Storage Affiliates Trust and CubeSmart. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20212022202320242025
188.35M
273.04M
(NSA) Total Revenue
(CUBE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NSA vs. CUBE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between National Storage Affiliates Trust and CubeSmart over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
69.6%
(NSA) Gross Margin
(CUBE) Gross Margin
NSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported a gross profit of 188.35M and revenue of 188.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CUBE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported a gross profit of 190.10M and revenue of 273.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.6%.

NSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported an operating income of 360.00K and revenue of 188.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

CUBE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported an operating income of 114.88M and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.1%.

NSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported a net income of 21.76M and revenue of 188.35M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

CUBE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported a net income of 89.20M and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.