NSA vs. COLD
NSA (National Storage Affiliates Trust) and COLD (Americold Realty Trust) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Industrial industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 5 years, NSA returned 2.93%/yr vs -13.99%/yr for COLD. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NSA vs. COLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSA achieves a 51.21% return, which is significantly higher than COLD's 18.87% return.
NSA
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 51.21%
- 6M
- 45.05%
- 1Y
- 29.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
COLD
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 21.99%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 39.88%
- 1Y
- -2.40%
- 3Y*
- -16.75%
- 5Y*
- -13.99%
- 10Y*
- —
NSA vs. COLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSA National Storage Affiliates Trust | 51.21% | -20.19% | -3.53% | 21.94% | -45.37% | 98.04% | 11.67% | 32.41% | 6.69% |
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 18.87% | -36.17% | -26.72% | 10.11% | -10.89% | -9.89% | 9.03% | 40.61% | 48.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSA and COLD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2018 | 0.50 |
Fundamentals
NSA:
$3.23B
COLD:
$4.29B
NSA:
$1.16
COLD:
-$0.39
NSA:
4.29
COLD:
1.65
NSA:
3.54
COLD:
1.52
NSA:
$749.98M
COLD:
$2.60B
NSA:
$212.81M
COLD:
-$101.19M
NSA:
$396.95M
COLD:
$311.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSA vs. COLD — Risk / Return Rank
NSA
COLD
NSA vs. COLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NSA | COLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | -0.05 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 0.26 | +1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.03 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | -0.07 | +1.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.93 | -0.13 | +4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NSA | COLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | -0.05 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | -0.43 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.04 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
NSA vs. COLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSA drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, smaller than the maximum COLD drawdown of -70.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSA and COLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSA | COLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.05% | -70.76% | +15.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.81% | -41.15% | +26.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.08% | -67.06% | +27.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.05% | -70.76% | +15.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.45% | -55.06% | +32.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.02% | -22.27% | +4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.86% | 23.23% | -15.37% |
Volatility
NSA vs. COLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) is 7.66%, while Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a volatility of 19.74%. This indicates that NSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSA | COLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 19.74% | -12.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.33% | 34.96% | -2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.29% | 44.65% | -5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.59% | 32.91% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.05% | 32.18% | -1.13% |
Dividends
NSA vs. COLD - Dividend Comparison
NSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, less than COLD's 6.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 6.14% | 7.15% | 4.11% | 2.91% | 3.11% | 2.68% | 2.25% | 2.28% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NSA National Storage Affiliates Trust | 5.45% | 8.08% | 5.94% | 5.38% | 5.95% | 2.30% | 3.75% | 3.78% | 4.38% | 3.82% | 3.99% | 3.15% |
Financials
NSA vs. COLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National Storage Affiliates Trust and Americold Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NSA vs. COLD - Profitability Comparison
NSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 185.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
COLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 185.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
COLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported an operating income of 14.29M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.
NSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported a net income of 28.64M and revenue of 185.40M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
COLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a net income of -13.56M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NSA and COLD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COLD has higher volatility (19.74%) compared to NSA (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSA dropped -55.05% vs COLD's -70.76%.
NSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSA and COLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer