PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSA vs. COLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NSA vs. COLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSA achieves a 51.21% return, which is significantly higher than COLD's 18.87% return.


NSA

1D
1.01%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
51.21%
6M
45.05%
1Y
29.97%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
12.26%

COLD

1D
-2.35%
1M
21.99%
YTD
18.87%
6M
39.88%
1Y
-2.40%
3Y*
-16.75%
5Y*
-13.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSA vs. COLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NSA
National Storage Affiliates Trust
51.21%-20.19%-3.53%21.94%-45.37%98.04%11.67%32.41%6.69%
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
18.87%-36.17%-26.72%10.11%-10.89%-9.89%9.03%40.61%48.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NSA and COLD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2018

0.50

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NSA:

$3.23B

COLD:

$4.29B

EPS

NSA:

$1.16

COLD:

-$0.39

PS Ratio

NSA:

4.29

COLD:

1.65

PB Ratio

NSA:

3.54

COLD:

1.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

NSA:

$749.98M

COLD:

$2.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NSA:

$212.81M

COLD:

-$101.19M

EBITDA (TTM)

NSA:

$396.95M

COLD:

$311.42M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSA vs. COLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSA
NSA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

COLD
COLD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
COLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
COLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLD Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSA vs. COLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSACOLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

-0.05

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

0.26

+1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.03

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

-0.07

+1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.93

-0.13

+4.06

NSA vs. COLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the COLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSA and COLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSACOLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

-0.05

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

-0.43

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.04

+0.49

Drawdowns

NSA vs. COLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSA drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, smaller than the maximum COLD drawdown of -70.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSA and COLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSACOLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.05%

-70.76%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.81%

-41.15%

+26.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.08%

-67.06%

+27.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.05%

-70.76%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.45%

-55.06%

+32.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.02%

-22.27%

+4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.86%

23.23%

-15.37%

Volatility

NSA vs. COLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) is 7.66%, while Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a volatility of 19.74%. This indicates that NSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSACOLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.66%

19.74%

-12.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.33%

34.96%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.29%

44.65%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.59%

32.91%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.05%

32.18%

-1.13%

Dividends

NSA vs. COLD - Dividend Comparison

NSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, less than COLD's 6.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
6.14%7.15%4.11%2.91%3.11%2.68%2.25%2.28%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NSA
National Storage Affiliates Trust
5.45%8.08%5.94%5.38%5.95%2.30%3.75%3.78%4.38%3.82%3.99%3.15%

Financials

NSA vs. COLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National Storage Affiliates Trust and Americold Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
185.40M
629.87M
(NSA) Total Revenue
(COLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NSA vs. COLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between National Storage Affiliates Trust and Americold Realty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
NSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 185.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

COLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 185.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

COLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported an operating income of 14.29M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

NSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported a net income of 28.64M and revenue of 185.40M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.

COLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a net income of -13.56M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NSA and COLD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COLD has higher volatility (19.74%) compared to NSA (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSA dropped -55.05% vs COLD's -70.76%.

NSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSA and COLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer