PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSA vs. AMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NSA vs. AMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSA achieves a 53.01% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's 4.84% return. Over the past 10 years, NSA has outperformed AMT with an annualized return of 12.39%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.


NSA

1D
1.19%
1M
1.83%
YTD
53.01%
6M
46.74%
1Y
34.35%
3Y*
10.59%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
12.39%

AMT

1D
-1.77%
1M
0.75%
YTD
4.84%
6M
5.49%
1Y
-11.45%
3Y*
1.89%
5Y*
-4.38%
10Y*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSA vs. AMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSA
National Storage Affiliates Trust
53.01%-20.19%-3.53%21.94%-45.37%98.04%11.67%32.41%1.21%29.01%
AMT
American Tower Corporation
4.84%-0.92%-12.16%5.37%-25.67%32.89%-0.48%47.87%13.32%37.71%

Correlation

The correlation between NSA and AMT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2015

0.47

The correlation between NSA and AMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NSA:

$3.27B

AMT:

$85.08B

EPS

NSA:

$1.16

AMT:

$6.14

PE Ratio

NSA:

36.39

AMT:

29.66

PEG Ratio

NSA:

3.23

AMT:

8.46

PS Ratio

NSA:

4.34

AMT:

7.89

PB Ratio

NSA:

3.58

AMT:

23.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

NSA:

$749.98M

AMT:

$10.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NSA:

$212.81M

AMT:

$7.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

NSA:

$396.95M

AMT:

$6.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSA vs. AMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSA
NSA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
NSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AMT
AMT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
AMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSA vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSAAMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.94

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

-0.43

+2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

-0.63

+5.59

NSA vs. AMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the AMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSA and AMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSAAMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

-0.50

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

-0.17

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.31

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.20

+0.34

Drawdowns

NSA vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSA drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSA and AMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSAAMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.05%

-98.70%

+43.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.81%

-26.67%

+11.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.08%

-27.54%

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.05%

-45.34%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.05%

-45.34%

-9.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.53%

-30.49%

+8.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.02%

-27.02%

+9.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.94%

18.22%

-11.28%

Volatility

NSA vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison

National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) and American Tower Corporation (AMT) have volatilities of 7.45% and 7.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSAAMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.45%

7.26%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.34%

18.40%

+13.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.30%

23.21%

+16.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.59%

26.23%

+5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.04%

26.12%

+4.92%

Dividends

NSA vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison

NSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than AMT's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMT
American Tower Corporation
3.78%3.87%3.53%2.99%2.77%1.78%2.02%1.64%1.99%1.84%2.05%1.87%
NSA
National Storage Affiliates Trust
5.38%8.08%5.94%5.38%5.95%2.30%3.75%3.78%4.38%3.82%3.99%3.15%

Financials

NSA vs. AMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National Storage Affiliates Trust and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
185.40M
2.74B
(NSA) Total Revenue
(AMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NSA vs. AMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between National Storage Affiliates Trust and American Tower Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
73.9%
Portfolio components
NSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 185.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Tower Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 2.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.9%.

NSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 185.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Tower Corporation reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.

NSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Storage Affiliates Trust reported a net income of 28.64M and revenue of 185.40M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.

AMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Tower Corporation reported a net income of 836.80M and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in a net margin of 30.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NSA and AMT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSA has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to AMT (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSA dropped -55.05% vs AMT's -98.70%.

NSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSA and AMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer