PortfoliosLab logo
NRT vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NRT and SCHG is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NRT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North European Oil Royalty Trust (NRT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NRT:

-0.68

SCHG:

0.67

Sortino Ratio

NRT:

-0.79

SCHG:

1.11

Omega Ratio

NRT:

0.90

SCHG:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

NRT:

-0.45

SCHG:

0.74

Martin Ratio

NRT:

-0.91

SCHG:

2.47

Ulcer Index

NRT:

36.36%

SCHG:

7.02%

Daily Std Dev

NRT:

49.54%

SCHG:

25.26%

Max Drawdown

NRT:

-85.54%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

NRT:

-66.93%

SCHG:

-7.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRT achieves a 21.79% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, NRT has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of -0.35%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.66% annualized return.


NRT

YTD

21.79%

1M

16.19%

6M

10.59%

1Y

-33.67%

5Y*

13.80%

10Y*

-0.35%

SCHG

YTD

-2.92%

1M

10.96%

6M

-2.63%

1Y

16.87%

5Y*

19.58%

10Y*

15.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NRT vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NRT is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NRT is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NRT is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NRT is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NRT is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NRT is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NRT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North European Oil Royalty Trust (NRT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRT and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NRT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

NRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, more than SCHG's 0.42% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NRT
North European Oil Royalty Trust
9.63%11.88%38.77%14.42%4.70%11.00%13.87%12.07%10.92%10.15%17.45%16.04%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.42%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

NRT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRT drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRT and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NRT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

North European Oil Royalty Trust (NRT) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 7.90%. This indicates that NRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...