PortfoliosLab logo
NRT vs. CRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NRT and CRT is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NRT vs. CRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North European Oil Royalty Trust (NRT) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NRT:

-0.38

CRT:

-0.59

Sortino Ratio

NRT:

-0.44

CRT:

-0.55

Omega Ratio

NRT:

0.95

CRT:

0.93

Calmar Ratio

NRT:

-0.31

CRT:

-0.32

Martin Ratio

NRT:

-0.84

CRT:

-0.87

Ulcer Index

NRT:

27.54%

CRT:

24.28%

Daily Std Dev

NRT:

47.81%

CRT:

40.58%

Max Drawdown

NRT:

-85.54%

CRT:

-83.46%

Current Drawdown

NRT:

-64.07%

CRT:

-59.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NRT:

$44.57M

CRT:

$60.36M

EPS

NRT:

$0.56

CRT:

$0.99

PE Ratio

NRT:

8.66

CRT:

10.16

PEG Ratio

NRT:

0.00

CRT:

0.00

PS Ratio

NRT:

7.50

CRT:

8.83

PB Ratio

NRT:

32.79

CRT:

25.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

NRT:

$3.66M

CRT:

$6.79M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NRT:

$3.44M

CRT:

$9.94M

EBITDA (TTM)

NRT:

$3.31M

CRT:

$6.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRT achieves a 32.31% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's 4.51% return. Over the past 10 years, NRT has underperformed CRT with an annualized return of 1.19%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.99% annualized return.


NRT

YTD

32.31%

1M

13.28%

6M

30.06%

1Y

-18.24%

3Y*

-26.33%

5Y*

12.10%

10Y*

1.19%

CRT

YTD

4.51%

1M

-3.26%

6M

-4.81%

1Y

-23.83%

3Y*

-12.70%

5Y*

16.83%

10Y*

2.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


North European Oil Royalty Trust

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NRT vs. CRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NRT is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NRT is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NRT is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NRT is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NRT is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NRT is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRT is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRT is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRT is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRT is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRT is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRT is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NRT vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North European Oil Royalty Trust (NRT) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is higher than the CRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRT and CRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NRT vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison

NRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%, less than CRT's 9.75% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NRT
North European Oil Royalty Trust
9.25%11.88%38.77%14.42%4.70%11.00%13.87%12.07%10.92%10.15%17.45%16.04%
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
9.75%9.55%10.97%7.69%9.70%9.44%10.05%13.08%6.86%5.90%10.41%15.33%

Drawdowns

NRT vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRT drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum CRT drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRT and CRT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NRT vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison

North European Oil Royalty Trust (NRT) has a higher volatility of 12.94% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 5.69%. This indicates that NRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NRT vs. CRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between North European Oil Royalty Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00M4.00M6.00M8.00M10.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
505.70K
2.05M
(NRT) Total Revenue
(CRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NRT vs. CRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between North European Oil Royalty Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
56.8%
100.0%
(NRT) Gross Margin
(CRT) Gross Margin
NRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, North European Oil Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 287.42K and revenue of 505.70K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.8%.

CRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 2.05M and revenue of 2.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

NRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, North European Oil Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 505.70K and revenue of 505.70K, resulting in an operating margin of 100.0%.

CRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 1.77M and revenue of 2.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 86.3%.

NRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, North European Oil Royalty Trust reported a net income of 285.47K and revenue of 505.70K, resulting in a net margin of 56.5%.

CRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 1.78M and revenue of 2.05M, resulting in a net margin of 86.9%.