PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRGD vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRGD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGD achieves a -76.50% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return.


NRGD

1D
-4.00%
1M
-39.03%
6M
-66.80%
YTD
-76.50%
1Y
-80.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-72.99%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$596.57K$512.25K$693.52K
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M

NRGD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NRGD and SCHD is -0.34, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

-0.45

The correlation between NRGD and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (all time) to -0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NRGD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NRGD
SCHD

Energy

100.0%
14.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

20.6%

Financial Services

-

9.9%

Healthcare

-

20.8%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

12.7%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Energy

NRGD
100.0%
SCHD
14.1%

Basic Materials

NRGD

-

SCHD
1.2%

Communication Services

NRGD

-

SCHD
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

NRGD

-

SCHD
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

NRGD

-

SCHD
20.6%

Financial Services

NRGD

-

SCHD
9.9%

Healthcare

NRGD

-

SCHD
20.8%

Industrials

NRGD

-

SCHD
7.8%

Real Estate

NRGD

-

SCHD

-

Technology

NRGD

-

SCHD
12.7%

Utilities

NRGD

-

SCHD
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRGD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NRGD
NRGD Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
NRGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGD Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NRGD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRGDSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.51

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

6.74

-7.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

17.01

-18.51

NRGD vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGD Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGD and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRGD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -91.37%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGDSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.37%

-33.37%

-58.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.12%

-4.61%

-77.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.37%

-1.24%

-90.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.97%

-3.30%

-58.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.39%

1.82%

+51.57%

Volatility

NRGD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) has a higher volatility of 23.01% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 4.11%. This indicates that NRGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGDSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.01%

4.11%

+18.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.45%

8.11%

+52.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.10%

11.13%

+64.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.89%

14.39%

+73.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.89%

16.72%

+71.17%

NRGD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRGD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

NRGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NRGD
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRGD and SCHD have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRGD has higher volatility (23.01%) compared to SCHD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGD dropped -91.37% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 1-year performance, SCHD leads with 31.54% vs -80.85% for NRGD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 31.54% return vs -80.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGD.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.00% for NRGD.

NRGD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. NRGD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%), while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGD and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRGD and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer