NRGD vs. SCHD
NRGD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NRGD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%), while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NRGD returned -80.85% vs 31.54% for SCHD. Their -0.45 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NRGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
NRGD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRGD achieves a -76.50% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return.
NRGD
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- -39.03%
- 6M
- -66.80%
- YTD
- -76.50%
- 1Y
- -80.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -72.99%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $596.57K | $512.25K | $693.52K | |
| $786.88M | $715.86M | $685.58M |
NRGD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -76.50% | -35.40% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 24.03% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRGD and SCHD is -0.34, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | -0.45 |
The correlation between NRGD and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (all time) to -0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NRGD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NRGD
SCHD
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
NRGD
SCHD
Basic Materials
NRGD
-
SCHD
Communication Services
NRGD
-
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
NRGD
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
NRGD
-
SCHD
Financial Services
NRGD
-
SCHD
Healthcare
NRGD
-
SCHD
Industrials
NRGD
-
SCHD
Real Estate
NRGD
-
SCHD
-
Technology
NRGD
-
SCHD
Utilities
NRGD
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRGD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
NRGD
SCHD
NRGD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NRGD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.51 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 6.74 | -7.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | 17.01 | -18.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NRGD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -91.37%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRGD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.37% | -33.37% | -58.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.12% | -4.61% | -77.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.37% | -1.24% | -90.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.97% | -3.30% | -58.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.39% | 1.82% | +51.57% |
Volatility
NRGD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) has a higher volatility of 23.01% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 4.11%. This indicates that NRGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRGD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.01% | 4.11% | +18.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.45% | 8.11% | +52.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.10% | 11.13% | +64.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.89% | 14.39% | +73.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.89% | 16.72% | +71.17% |
NRGD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRGD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
NRGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.13% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NRGD and SCHD have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRGD has higher volatility (23.01%) compared to SCHD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGD dropped -91.37% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 1-year performance, SCHD leads with 31.54% vs -80.85% for NRGD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 31.54% return vs -80.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.00% for NRGD.
NRGD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. NRGD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%), while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGD and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NRGD and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer