NREF vs. VT
NREF (NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc.) is a stock, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 5 years, NREF returned 6.73%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for VT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NREF vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NREF achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 12.24% return.
NREF
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 14.18%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
NREF vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NREF NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. | 14.18% | 2.28% | 13.51% | 17.36% | -8.90% | 27.81% | -2.81% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between NREF and VT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2020 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NREF vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
NREF
VT
NREF vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. (NREF) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NREF | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 2.31 | -1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 3.20 | -2.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.42 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 3.04 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.01 | 13.53 | -10.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NREF | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 2.31 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.69 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.44 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
NREF vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NREF drawdown since its inception was -66.09%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NREF and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NREF | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.09% | -50.27% | -15.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -9.67% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.00% | -16.51% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.78% | -26.38% | -18.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -0.88% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -7.02% | -9.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.08% | 2.17% | +3.91% |
Volatility
NREF vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. (NREF) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that NREF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NREF | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 3.83% | +3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.81% | 10.17% | +6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.93% | 12.70% | +13.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.22% | 16.05% | +17.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.77% | 17.23% | +28.54% |
Dividends
NREF vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
NREF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.89%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NREF NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. | 12.89% | 14.20% | 12.75% | 17.40% | 12.59% | 9.87% | 8.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NREF and VT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NREF has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NREF dropped -66.09% vs VT's -50.27%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NREF and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer