PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NQ=F vs. FNGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NQ=F vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.78%
17.63%
NQ=F
FNGS

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NQ=F achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 42.85% return.


NQ=F

YTD

22.34%

1M

1.68%

6M

10.79%

1Y

29.47%

5Y (annualized)

19.78%

10Y (annualized)

17.03%

FNGS

YTD

42.85%

1M

4.96%

6M

17.63%

1Y

49.34%

5Y (annualized)

34.16%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


NQ=FFNGS
Sharpe Ratio1.392.10
Sortino Ratio1.922.67
Omega Ratio1.261.36
Calmar Ratio1.722.92
Martin Ratio5.849.48
Ulcer Index4.13%5.48%
Daily Std Dev17.12%24.78%
Max Drawdown-35.28%-48.98%
Current Drawdown-1.91%-0.52%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between NQ=F and FNGS is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NQ=F vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NQ=F, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.001.391.86
The chart of Sortino ratio for NQ=F, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.501.922.43
The chart of Omega ratio for NQ=F, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.261.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for NQ=F, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.001.722.56
The chart of Martin ratio for NQ=F, currently valued at 5.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.005.848.13
NQ=F
FNGS

The current NQ=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQ=F and FNGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.39
1.86
NQ=F
FNGS

Drawdowns

NQ=F vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQ=F drawdown since its inception was -35.28%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQ=F and FNGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.91%
-0.52%
NQ=F
FNGS

Volatility

NQ=F vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F) is 5.42%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that NQ=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.42%
6.72%
NQ=F
FNGS