PortfoliosLab logo
NQ=F vs. FNGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NQ=F and FNGS is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

NQ=F vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%350.00%400.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
143.73%
344.12%
NQ=F
FNGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NQ=F:

0.40

FNGS:

0.80

Sortino Ratio

NQ=F:

0.64

FNGS:

1.22

Omega Ratio

NQ=F:

1.09

FNGS:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

NQ=F:

0.37

FNGS:

0.91

Martin Ratio

NQ=F:

1.17

FNGS:

2.64

Ulcer Index

NQ=F:

7.10%

FNGS:

9.20%

Daily Std Dev

NQ=F:

24.80%

FNGS:

32.13%

Max Drawdown

NQ=F:

-35.28%

FNGS:

-48.98%

Current Drawdown

NQ=F:

-9.46%

FNGS:

-10.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NQ=F achieves a -5.09% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's -4.29% return.


NQ=F

YTD

-5.09%

1M

4.45%

6M

-5.11%

1Y

10.61%

5Y*

16.42%

10Y*

16.15%

FNGS

YTD

-4.29%

1M

8.03%

6M

2.01%

1Y

25.57%

5Y*

27.92%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NQ=F vs. FNGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQ=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NQ=F is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NQ=F is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NQ=F is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NQ=F is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NQ=F is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NQ=F is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGS is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGS is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGS is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NQ=F vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NQ=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQ=F and FNGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.40
0.77
NQ=F
FNGS

Drawdowns

NQ=F vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQ=F drawdown since its inception was -35.28%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQ=F and FNGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.46%
-10.48%
NQ=F
FNGS

Volatility

NQ=F vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F) is 8.15%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 10.27%. This indicates that NQ=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.15%
10.27%
NQ=F
FNGS