NQ=F vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

NQ=F (E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures) is an asset, while FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

NQ=F vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NQ=F

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGS

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -7.56%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 6M: 2.54%
• 1Y: 12.94%
• 3Y*: 30.15%
• 5Y*: 17.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NQ=F vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NQ=F E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	24.43%	-32.46%	26.66%	47.22%	5.77%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	4.28%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	16.96%	101.99%	10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between NQ=F and FNGS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019	0.64

The correlation between NQ=F and FNGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NQ=F vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQ=F

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 17
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NQ=F vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NQ=F	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.58	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.94	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.12	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.57	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.58	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	NQ=F	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-48.98%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-22.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-11.75%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.84%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NQ=F	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.60%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	30.25%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	31.22%	—

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NQ=F and FNGS in my portfolio?

NQ=F and FNGS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.