NOBL vs. REGL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NOBL returned 9.51%/yr vs 9.12%/yr for REGL. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for REGL.

Performance

NOBL vs. REGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than REGL's 3.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NOBL having a 9.51% annualized return and REGL not far behind at 9.12%.

NOBL

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 3.51%
• 6M: 3.45%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 9.51%

REGL

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -2.06%
• YTD: 3.98%
• 6M: 4.90%
• 1Y: 9.25%
• 3Y*: 10.42%
• 5Y*: 5.92%
• 10Y*: 9.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. REGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.51%	6.84%	6.72%	8.09%	-6.52%	25.46%	8.35%	27.39%	-3.26%	21.02%
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.98%	6.89%	12.26%	5.41%	-0.62%	20.38%	7.50%	18.79%	-3.25%	10.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and REGL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2015	0.85

The correlation between NOBL and REGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

NOBL vs. REGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NOBL	REGL
Consumer Defensive	23.5%	3.8%
Industrials	20.3%	15.1%
Financial Services	12.4%	30.0%
Basic Materials	10.9%	9.3%
Healthcare	9.7%	4.5%
Utilities	6.4%	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	9.6%
Real Estate	4.6%	7.8%
Technology	3.6%	2.0%
Energy	3.4%	3.4%
Communication Services	-	-

Return for Risk

NOBL vs. REGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 22
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 21

REGL

REGL Risk / Return Rank: 21
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOBL	REGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	0.70	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	1.13	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.13	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	0.96	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.58	3.07	-0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOBL vs. REGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the REGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and REGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOBL	REGL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	0.70	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.37	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.50	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.52	+0.12

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, roughly equal to the maximum REGL drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and REGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOBL	REGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-36.37%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-9.67%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.36%	-16.96%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.92%	-16.96%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.43%	-36.37%	+0.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.99%	-5.82%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-4.08%	+0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	3.02%	+0.48%

Volatility

NOBL vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 2.36%, while ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOBL	REGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.36%	3.65%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.00%	9.23%	-1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.33%	13.22%	-1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	16.11%	-1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.60%	18.33%	-1.73%

NOBL vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than REGL's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOBL vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than REGL's 2.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.12%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.24%	2.32%	2.28%	2.40%	2.32%	2.50%	2.41%	1.96%	2.09%	1.63%	1.20%	1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOBL and REGL in my portfolio?

NOBL and REGL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOBL or REGL?

REGL has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs REGL's -36.37%.

Which ETF is better, NOBL or REGL?

On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.51% vs 9.12% for REGL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NOBL or REGL?

Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.51% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NOBL or REGL?

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NOBL or REGL?

REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 2.12% for NOBL.

What is the main difference between NOBL and REGL?

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while REGL is Mid Cap Value Equities. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.40% for REGL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.