NNE vs. CLS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).

Performance

NNE vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NNE vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NNE NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.	-15.04%	-3.55%	379.67%
CLS Celestica Inc.	-2.33%	220.27%	87.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NNE : $1.02B CLS : $33.46B
EPS NNE : -$150.61 CLS : $7.19
PB Ratio NNE : 0.00 CLS : 15.13
Total Revenue (TTM) NNE : $0.00 CLS : $12.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) NNE : -$586.84K CLS : $1.44B
EBITDA (TTM) NNE : $11.52B CLS : $1.21B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNE achieves a -15.04% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's -2.33% return.

NNE

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -26.01%
• YTD: -15.04%
• 6M: -47.84%
• 1Y: -21.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLS

• 1D: 2.50%
• 1M: 8.15%
• YTD: -2.33%
• 6M: 14.72%
• 1Y: 265.20%
• 3Y*: 181.82%
• 5Y*: 101.42%
• 10Y*: 38.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NNE vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNE

NNE Risk / Return Rank: 33
NNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
NNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NNE Omega Ratio Rank: 36
NNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
NNE Martin Ratio Rank: 29

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNE vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NNE	CLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	3.72	-3.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	3.33	-2.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.44	-0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	9.11	-9.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.69	24.13	-24.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NNE vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNE Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNE and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NNE	CLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	3.72	-3.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.25	+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between NNE and CLS is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NNE vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither NNE nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NNE vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNE drawdown since its inception was -77.68%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNE and CLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	NNE	CLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.68%	-96.93%	+19.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.45%	-29.24%	-37.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.96%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.98%	-18.12%	-45.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.18%	-73.79%	+39.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.13%	11.04%	+22.09%

Volatility

NNE vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) is 16.92%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 23.56%. This indicates that NNE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NNE	CLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.92%	23.56%	-6.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.57%	55.01%	+11.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.81%	71.85%	+24.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	151.34%	55.71%	+95.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	151.34%	48.75%	+102.59%

Financials