PortfoliosLab logo
NMR vs. MUFG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NMR and MUFG is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

NMR vs. MUFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NMR) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NMR:

0.12

MUFG:

1.09

Sortino Ratio

NMR:

0.32

MUFG:

1.58

Omega Ratio

NMR:

1.04

MUFG:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

NMR:

0.02

MUFG:

1.37

Martin Ratio

NMR:

0.12

MUFG:

4.05

Ulcer Index

NMR:

12.24%

MUFG:

9.46%

Daily Std Dev

NMR:

37.91%

MUFG:

35.01%

Max Drawdown

NMR:

-86.15%

MUFG:

-76.79%

Current Drawdown

NMR:

-58.97%

MUFG:

-5.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NMR:

$18.20B

MUFG:

$157.87B

EPS

NMR:

$0.77

MUFG:

$1.12

PE Ratio

NMR:

7.83

MUFG:

12.25

PEG Ratio

NMR:

0.85

MUFG:

3.12

PS Ratio

NMR:

0.01

MUFG:

0.02

PB Ratio

NMR:

0.75

MUFG:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

NMR:

$2.11T

MUFG:

$7.10T

Gross Profit (TTM)

NMR:

$1.29T

MUFG:

$6.72T

EBITDA (TTM)

NMR:

$883.17B

MUFG:

-$29.21B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMR achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than MUFG's 20.48% return. Over the past 10 years, NMR has underperformed MUFG with an annualized return of 1.82%, while MUFG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.


NMR

YTD

5.18%

1M

9.73%

6M

0.16%

1Y

4.64%

3Y*

16.34%

5Y*

9.88%

10Y*

1.82%

MUFG

YTD

20.48%

1M

11.71%

6M

18.56%

1Y

37.76%

3Y*

39.56%

5Y*

32.10%

10Y*

10.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nomura Holdings, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NMR vs. MUFG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NMR is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NMR is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NMR is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NMR is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NMR is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NMR is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MUFG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MUFG is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MUFG is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MUFG is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MUFG is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MUFG is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MUFG is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NMR vs. MUFG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NMR) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the MUFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMR and MUFG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NMR vs. MUFG - Dividend Comparison

NMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NMR
Nomura Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%3.86%4.79%4.45%3.19%3.41%3.07%1.79%3.34%2.44%
MUFG
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.17%2.50%2.90%3.36%4.25%5.33%3.99%3.85%2.20%2.70%2.34%2.94%

Drawdowns

NMR vs. MUFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMR drawdown since its inception was -86.15%, which is greater than MUFG's maximum drawdown of -76.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMR and MUFG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NMR vs. MUFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NMR) is 6.59%, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that NMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NMR vs. MUFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nomura Holdings, Inc. and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T20212022202320242025
458.34B
1.61T
(NMR) Total Revenue
(MUFG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items