NMFC vs. WHF
NMFC (New Mountain Finance Corporation) and WHF (WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, NMFC returned 5.17%/yr vs 7.98%/yr for WHF. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NMFC vs. WHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMFC achieves a -17.28% return, which is significantly lower than WHF's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, NMFC has underperformed WHF with an annualized return of 5.17%, while WHF has yielded a comparatively higher 7.98% annualized return.
NMFC
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- -17.28%
- 6M
- -16.28%
- 1Y
- -21.62%
- 3Y*
- -5.11%
- 5Y*
- -0.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
WHF
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- -11.96%
- 3Y*
- -6.52%
- 5Y*
- -3.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
NMFC vs. WHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFC New Mountain Finance Corporation | -17.28% | -7.17% | -0.95% | 15.47% | -0.55% | 31.94% | -7.13% | 20.64% | 2.78% | 5.71% |
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 1.11% | -15.36% | -8.52% | 6.26% | -6.23% | 25.77% | 19.14% | 20.83% | 4.80% | 21.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between NMFC and WHF is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2012 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
NMFC:
$328.53
WHF:
$0.69
NMFC:
0.02
WHF:
9.52
NMFC:
2.09
WHF:
3.15
NMFC:
$315.55M
WHF:
$47.81M
NMFC:
$203.95M
WHF:
$14.33M
NMFC:
$106.53M
WHF:
-$4.37M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NMFC vs. WHF — Risk / Return Rank
NMFC
WHF
NMFC vs. WHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NMFC | WHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.95 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.45 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.66 | -0.82 | -0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NMFC vs. WHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMFC drawdown since its inception was -64.16%, which is greater than WHF's maximum drawdown of -57.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFC and WHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMFC | WHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.16% | -57.48% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.87% | -26.51% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.07% | -37.91% | +9.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.07% | -37.91% | +9.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.16% | -57.48% | -6.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.07% | -29.51% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -9.00% | +3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.08% | 14.53% | -1.45% |
Volatility
NMFC vs. WHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) is 6.99%, while WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) has a volatility of 10.10%. This indicates that NMFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NMFC | WHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 10.10% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.62% | 20.68% | -2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.02% | 28.23% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 22.97% | -4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 31.57% | -5.61% |
Dividends
NMFC vs. WHF - Dividend Comparison
NMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.11%, less than WHF's 18.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFC New Mountain Finance Corporation | 17.11% | 13.90% | 12.17% | 11.40% | 9.86% | 8.76% | 10.92% | 9.90% | 10.81% | 10.04% | 9.65% | 10.45% |
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 18.02% | 20.72% | 18.44% | 12.60% | 11.26% | 10.03% | 13.96% | 11.79% | 11.16% | 10.58% | 11.67% | 12.37% |
Financials
NMFC vs. WHF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New Mountain Finance Corporation and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NMFC and WHF have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WHF has higher volatility (10.10%) compared to NMFC (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMFC dropped -64.16% vs WHF's -57.48%.
WHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NMFC and WHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer