PortfoliosLab logo
NMFC vs. HRZN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NMFC and HRZN is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

NMFC vs. HRZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NMFC:

-0.44

HRZN:

-0.84

Sortino Ratio

NMFC:

-0.49

HRZN:

-0.93

Omega Ratio

NMFC:

0.93

HRZN:

0.84

Calmar Ratio

NMFC:

-0.39

HRZN:

-0.57

Martin Ratio

NMFC:

-1.14

HRZN:

-1.32

Ulcer Index

NMFC:

8.14%

HRZN:

18.91%

Daily Std Dev

NMFC:

20.71%

HRZN:

30.04%

Max Drawdown

NMFC:

-64.16%

HRZN:

-60.44%

Current Drawdown

NMFC:

-10.13%

HRZN:

-39.36%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NMFC:

$1.16B

HRZN:

$305.49M

EPS

NMFC:

$0.99

HRZN:

-$0.96

PEG Ratio

NMFC:

0.00

HRZN:

2.07

PS Ratio

NMFC:

3.17

HRZN:

3.11

PB Ratio

NMFC:

0.87

HRZN:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

NMFC:

$274.13M

HRZN:

$66.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NMFC:

$232.38M

HRZN:

$59.77M

EBITDA (TTM)

NMFC:

$130.61M

HRZN:

$14.03M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMFC achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly higher than HRZN's -10.31% return. Over the past 10 years, NMFC has outperformed HRZN with an annualized return of 6.66%, while HRZN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.45% annualized return.


NMFC

YTD

-1.53%

1M

10.01%

6M

-4.53%

1Y

-9.24%

3Y*

3.25%

5Y*

12.79%

10Y*

6.66%

HRZN

YTD

-10.31%

1M

7.66%

6M

-12.64%

1Y

-25.28%

3Y*

-4.48%

5Y*

3.01%

10Y*

4.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


New Mountain Finance Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NMFC vs. HRZN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NMFC is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NMFC is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NMFC is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NMFC is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NMFC is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NMFC is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

HRZN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HRZN is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HRZN is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HRZN is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HRZN is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HRZN is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HRZN is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NMFC vs. HRZN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NMFC Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is higher than the HRZN Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMFC and HRZN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NMFC vs. HRZN - Dividend Comparison

NMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, less than HRZN's 17.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NMFC
New Mountain Finance Corporation
6.31%6.04%11.71%9.86%8.76%10.92%9.90%10.81%10.04%9.65%10.45%9.91%
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation
17.44%14.68%10.02%10.43%7.54%9.44%9.28%10.67%10.70%12.96%11.76%9.86%

Drawdowns

NMFC vs. HRZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMFC drawdown since its inception was -64.16%, which is greater than HRZN's maximum drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFC and HRZN.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NMFC vs. HRZN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) is 6.71%, while Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that NMFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NMFC vs. HRZN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New Mountain Finance Corporation and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-150.00M-100.00M-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M20212022202320242025
85.66M
24.52M
(NMFC) Total Revenue
(HRZN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NMFC vs. HRZN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between New Mountain Finance Corporation and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(NMFC) Gross Margin
(HRZN) Gross Margin
NMFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, New Mountain Finance Corporation reported a gross profit of 85.66M and revenue of 85.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

HRZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported a gross profit of 24.52M and revenue of 24.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

NMFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, New Mountain Finance Corporation reported an operating income of 83.76M and revenue of 85.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 97.8%.

HRZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported an operating income of 22.96M and revenue of 24.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 93.6%.

NMFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, New Mountain Finance Corporation reported a net income of 34.64M and revenue of 85.66M, resulting in a net margin of 40.4%.

HRZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported a net income of 11.10M and revenue of 24.52M, resulting in a net margin of 45.3%.