NLR vs. VDE
NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NLR returned 10.63%/yr vs 8.98%/yr for VDE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
NLR vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -15.72% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 29.27% return. Over the past 10 years, NLR has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 10.63%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.98% annualized return.
NLR
- 1D
- -4.31%
- 1M
- -16.00%
- 6M
- -27.85%
- YTD
- -15.72%
- 1Y
- -6.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.28%
- 5Y*
- 17.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
VDE
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 21.26%
- YTD
- 29.27%
- 1Y
- 37.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
NLR vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -15.72% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 29.27% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLR and VDE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2007 | 0.48 |
The correlation between NLR and VDE shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NLR vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NLR
VDE
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
NLR
VDE
Utilities
NLR
VDE
Industrials
NLR
VDE
Basic Materials
NLR
VDE
Technology
NLR
VDE
-
Communication Services
NLR
-
VDE
-
Consumer Cyclical
NLR
-
VDE
-
Consumer Defensive
NLR
-
VDE
-
Financial Services
NLR
-
VDE
-
Healthcare
NLR
-
VDE
-
Real Estate
NLR
-
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLR vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
NLR
VDE
NLR vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NLR | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 2.47 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 6.72 | -7.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NLR vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLR | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.05% | -74.20% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.32% | -15.04% | -21.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.32% | -21.41% | -14.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.32% | -26.58% | -9.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.32% | -69.29% | +32.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.32% | -8.54% | -27.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -19.91% | -15.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.87% | 5.52% | +10.35% |
Volatility
NLR vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) at 6.04%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLR | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 6.04% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.73% | 16.57% | +16.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.21% | 20.84% | +22.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 26.25% | +3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 29.91% | -5.49% |
NLR vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLR vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than VDE's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 3.02% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.51% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLR and VDE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to VDE (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 10.63% vs 8.98% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 8.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 2.51% for VDE.
NLR is categorized as Uranium, while VDE is Energy Equities. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.09% for VDE.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NLR and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer