NLR vs. VDE
NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NLR returned 11.82%/yr vs 9.35%/yr for VDE. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
NLR vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 29.92% return. Over the past 10 years, NLR has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 11.82%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.
NLR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- 6M
- -19.81%
- YTD
- -8.31%
- 1Y
- -2.31%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 19.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.63%
VDE
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 29.92%
- 1Y
- 38.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 22.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.69M | $46.94M | $58.37M | |
| $80.86M | $75.68M | $107.12M |
NLR vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -8.31% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 29.92% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLR and VDE is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2007 | 0.48 |
The correlation between NLR and VDE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NLR vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NLR
VDE
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
NLR
VDE
Utilities
NLR
VDE
Industrials
NLR
VDE
Basic Materials
NLR
VDE
Technology
NLR
VDE
-
Communication Services
NLR
-
VDE
-
Consumer Cyclical
NLR
-
VDE
-
Consumer Defensive
NLR
-
VDE
-
Financial Services
NLR
-
VDE
-
Healthcare
NLR
-
VDE
-
Real Estate
NLR
-
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLR vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
NLR
VDE
NLR vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NLR | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.30 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.56 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 6.84 | -6.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NLR vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLR | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.05% | -74.20% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.52% | -15.04% | -22.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.52% | -21.41% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.52% | -26.58% | -10.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.52% | -69.29% | +31.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.72% | -8.08% | -22.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.66% | -19.88% | -15.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.75% | 5.61% | +12.14% |
Volatility
NLR vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) at 6.35%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLR | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.81% | 6.35% | +6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.78% | 16.50% | +15.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.83% | 21.02% | +22.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.21% | 26.13% | +4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 29.91% | -5.28% |
NLR vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLR vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than VDE's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.78% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.49% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLR and VDE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to VDE (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 11.82% vs 9.35% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 11.82% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.49% for VDE.
NLR is categorized as Uranium, while VDE is Energy Equities. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.09% for VDE.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NLR and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer