NLR vs. U-U.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO).
NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NLR or U-U.TO.
Key characteristics
| NLR | U-U.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.19% | 7.84% |
| 1Y Return | 52.19% | 96.83% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.28 | 2.84 |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.80% | 34.33% |
| Max Drawdown | -66.96% | -39.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.07% | -8.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLR and U-U.TO is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NLR vs. U-U.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than U-U.TO's 7.84% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NLR vs. U-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NLR vs. U-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, while U-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 4.05% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.43% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% | 2.48% | 0.69% |
U-U.TO Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NLR vs. U-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, which is greater than U-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and U-U.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NLR vs. U-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) is 6.99%, while Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that NLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than U-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.