NLR vs. LIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while LIT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NLR returned 13.66%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for LIT. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LIT.

Performance

NLR vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 30.84% return. Over the past 10 years, NLR has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of 13.66%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.81% annualized return.

NLR

• 1D: -4.59%
• 1M: -8.11%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 36.84%
• 3Y*: 35.11%
• 5Y*: 21.94%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

LIT

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: 30.84%
• 6M: 34.89%
• 1Y: 135.24%
• 3Y*: 11.20%
• 5Y*: 4.98%
• 10Y*: 14.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLR vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	6.14%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	30.84%	60.05%	-19.19%	-12.18%	-29.91%	36.74%	127.88%	3.27%	-28.63%	64.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and LIT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2010	0.47

NLR vs. LIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NLR	LIT
Energy	46.0%	-
Utilities	37.4%	-
Industrials	15.1%	26.0%
Technology	1.5%	11.5%
Basic Materials	-	55.4%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NLR vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 25
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 94
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLR vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NLR	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	4.16	-3.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	4.45	-3.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.59	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	10.37	-8.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.93	35.19	-32.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NLR vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NLR	LIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	4.16	-3.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.16	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.48	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.27	-0.09

Drawdowns

NLR vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, roughly equal to the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLR	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.05%	-65.91%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.80%	-13.11%	-12.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.48%	-53.01%	+22.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.48%	-65.91%	+35.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.35%	-65.91%	+31.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.80%	-8.53%	-11.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.72%	-33.63%	-2.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.61%	3.86%	+8.75%

Volatility

NLR vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 13.18% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 8.67%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NLR	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.18%	8.67%	+4.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.83%	22.00%	+10.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.32%	32.68%	+9.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.24%	31.83%	-2.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.02%	30.66%	-6.64%

NLR vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NLR vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than LIT's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.37%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.40%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NLR and LIT in my portfolio?

NLR and LIT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NLR or LIT?

NLR has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to LIT (8.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs LIT's -65.91%.

Which ETF is better, NLR or LIT?

On 10-year performance, LIT leads with 14.81% vs 13.66% for NLR. On fees, NLR is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, LIT has been the lower-risk option at 8.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NLR or LIT?

Over the 10-year period, LIT has performed better with a 14.81% return vs 13.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NLR or LIT?

NLR is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NLR or LIT?

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.37% for LIT.

What is the main difference between NLR and LIT?

NLR is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while LIT is Commodity Producers Equities. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.75% for LIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.