PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NLR vs. LIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and LIT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

NLR vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.18%
6.55%
NLR
LIT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NLR:

0.64

LIT:

-0.45

Sortino Ratio

NLR:

1.11

LIT:

-0.48

Omega Ratio

NLR:

1.13

LIT:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

NLR:

0.83

LIT:

-0.24

Martin Ratio

NLR:

2.11

LIT:

-0.80

Ulcer Index

NLR:

8.40%

LIT:

18.56%

Daily Std Dev

NLR:

27.57%

LIT:

33.05%

Max Drawdown

NLR:

-66.96%

LIT:

-62.61%

Current Drawdown

NLR:

-14.47%

LIT:

-55.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's -17.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NLR having a 8.21% annualized return and LIT not far behind at 7.94%.


NLR

YTD

15.28%

1M

-11.51%

6M

-0.07%

1Y

18.78%

5Y*

13.66%

10Y*

8.21%

LIT

YTD

-17.23%

1M

-7.32%

6M

5.17%

1Y

-12.32%

5Y*

9.85%

10Y*

7.94%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NLR vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.


LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Expense ratio chart for LIT: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for NLR: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NLR vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NLR, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.64-0.45
The chart of Sortino ratio for NLR, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.11-0.48
The chart of Omega ratio for NLR, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.130.95
The chart of Calmar ratio for NLR, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.83-0.24
The chart of Martin ratio for NLR, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.11-0.80
NLR
LIT

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-2.00-1.000.001.002.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.64
-0.45
NLR
LIT

Dividends

NLR vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

NLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
NLR
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
0.00%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.43%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%2.48%0.69%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
1.45%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%0.32%

Drawdowns

NLR vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-14.47%
-55.25%
NLR
LIT

Volatility

NLR vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) is 7.93%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 8.78%. This indicates that NLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.93%
8.78%
NLR
LIT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab