NKLA vs. SCHG
NKLA (Nikola Corporation) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
Performance
NKLA vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NKLA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 25.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- 18.92%
NKLA vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NKLA Nikola Corporation | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 12.97% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NKLA vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
NKLA
SCHG
NKLA vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nikola Corporation (NKLA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NKLA | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.85 | — |
Drawdowns
NKLA vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NKLA drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NKLA and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NKLA | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -34.59% | +34.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -5.20% | +5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.90% | — |
Volatility
NKLA vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NKLA | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 15.45% | -15.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 22.27% | -22.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 21.55% | -21.55% |
Dividends
NKLA vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
NKLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NKLA Nikola Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Find the right allocation for NKLA and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer