PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NINOY vs. CDNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NINOY vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nikon Corp (NINOY) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NINOY achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 30.53% return. Over the past 10 years, NINOY has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of -0.94%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.37% annualized return.


NINOY

1D
7.81%
1M
11.76%
YTD
10.43%
6M
6.93%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
-0.94%

CDNS

1D
-2.01%
1M
16.73%
YTD
30.53%
6M
21.39%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
26.34%
10Y*
32.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NINOY vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NINOY
Nikon Corp
10.43%9.37%7.64%11.14%-17.77%71.73%-48.65%-18.02%-26.17%29.85%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
30.53%4.03%10.31%69.55%-13.80%36.59%96.70%59.52%3.97%65.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NINOY and CDNS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NINOY:

$4.02B

CDNS:

$111.68B

EPS

NINOY:

-$267.25

CDNS:

$4.28

PS Ratio

NINOY:

0.01

CDNS:

20.17

PB Ratio

NINOY:

0.01

CDNS:

12.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

NINOY:

$529.47B

CDNS:

$5.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NINOY:

$281.04B

CDNS:

$4.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

NINOY:

-$55.25B

CDNS:

$1.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nikon Corp

Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Return for Risk

NINOY vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NINOY
NINOY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NINOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NINOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NINOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NINOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NINOY Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NINOY vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nikon Corp (NINOY) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NINOYCDNSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

1.36

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

2.89

-0.03

NINOY vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NINOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINOY and CDNS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NINOYCDNSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

1.04

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.74

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.96

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.36

0.24

-0.61

Drawdowns

NINOY vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NINOY drawdown since its inception was -98.33%, which is greater than CDNS's maximum drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINOY and CDNS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NINOYCDNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.33%

-93.13%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.88%

-28.85%

+6.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.32%

-29.05%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.32%

-29.59%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.10%

-32.12%

-39.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.35%

-2.01%

-94.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.55%

-39.65%

-39.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.45%

13.58%

-5.13%

Volatility

NINOY vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Nikon Corp (NINOY) has a higher volatility of 24.84% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 12.68%. This indicates that NINOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NINOYCDNSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.84%

12.68%

+12.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.02%

30.56%

+7.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.78%

37.65%

+14.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.63%

35.94%

+5.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.83%

33.97%

+2.86%

Dividends

NINOY vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither NINOY nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NINOY
Nikon Corp
0.00%1.55%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.30%

Financials

NINOY vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nikon Corp and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
196.81B
1.47B
(NINOY) Total Revenue
(CDNS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NINOY vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nikon Corp and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
40.5%
95.9%
Portfolio components
NINOY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nikon Corp reported a gross profit of 79.64B and revenue of 196.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.

CDNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

NINOY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nikon Corp reported an operating income of 1.11B and revenue of 196.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.6%.

CDNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 431.33M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

NINOY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nikon Corp reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 196.81B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.

CDNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 335.66M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NINOY and CDNS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NINOY has higher volatility (24.84%) compared to CDNS (12.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NINOY dropped -98.33% vs CDNS's -93.13%.

CDNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NINOY and CDNS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer