PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NINE vs. XES
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NINE vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NINE vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
2,214.15%-69.13%-58.21%-81.56%1,353.00%-63.24%-65.22%-65.31%-13.64%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
39.21%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-51.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NINE achieves a 2,214.15% return, which is significantly higher than XES's 39.21% return.


NINE

1D
-2.44%
1M
1,264.49%
YTD
2,214.15%
6M
1,175.10%
1Y
601.75%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
28.88%
10Y*

XES

1D
-2.19%
1M
0.77%
YTD
39.21%
6M
55.34%
1Y
59.95%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
16.76%
10Y*
-2.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NINE vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NINE
NINE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NINE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NINE Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
NINE Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
NINE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NINE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NINE vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NINEXESDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.49

1.50

-1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

17.54

1.97

+15.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.24

1.29

+1.95

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.51

2.26

+5.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.84

6.81

+4.03

NINE vs. XES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NINE Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the XES Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINE and XES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NINEXESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.50

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.42

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

-0.08

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between NINE and XES is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NINE vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

NINE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.22%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Drawdowns

NINE vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NINE drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, roughly equal to the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINE and XES.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NINEXESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.19%

-95.65%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.93%

-27.52%

-45.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.06%

-45.95%

-52.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.52%

-73.12%

-6.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.28%

-54.22%

-26.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.26%

9.15%

+43.11%

Volatility

NINE vs. XES - Volatility Comparison

Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) has a higher volatility of 263.94% compared to SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) at 7.93%. This indicates that NINE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NINEXESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

263.94%

7.93%

+256.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

274.35%

22.22%

+252.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1,319.84%

40.10%

+1,279.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

594.82%

39.83%

+554.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

470.41%

45.19%

+425.22%