NINE vs. QYLD

In the year-to-date period, NINE achieves a -57.59% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's -5.59% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NINE Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINE and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NINE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.78%.

The maximum NINE drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINE and QYLD.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) has a higher volatility of 33.42% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.90%. This indicates that NINE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.