PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NINE vs. KLXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NINE vs. KLXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) and KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NINE achieves a 3,113.77% return, which is significantly higher than KLXE's 58.73% return.


NINE

1D
0.09%
1M
11.32%
YTD
3,113.77%
6M
2,423.85%
1Y
2,061.06%
3Y*
48.83%
5Y*
35.98%
10Y*

KLXE

1D
-2.91%
1M
-25.56%
YTD
58.73%
6M
80.72%
1Y
61.29%
3Y*
-30.89%
5Y*
-26.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NINE vs. KLXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
3,113.77%-69.13%-58.21%-81.56%1,353.00%-63.24%-65.22%-65.31%-25.61%
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
58.73%-62.05%-55.77%-34.95%458.39%-52.01%-79.94%-72.54%-21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NINE and KLXE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2018

0.47

The correlation between NINE and KLXE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NINE:

$154.98M

KLXE:

$58.50M

EPS

NINE:

$1.79

KLXE:

-$3.80

PS Ratio

NINE:

0.72

KLXE:

0.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

NINE:

$541.44M

KLXE:

$627.20M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NINE:

$46.43M

KLXE:

$83.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

NINE:

$41.45M

KLXE:

$66.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Return for Risk

NINE vs. KLXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NINE
NINE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NINE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NINE Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
NINE Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
NINE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
NINE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

KLXE
KLXE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
KLXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLXE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
KLXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLXE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NINE vs. KLXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) and KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NINEKLXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+19.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.03

1.18

+2.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

30.98

1.34

+29.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

50.90

2.05

+48.85

NINE vs. KLXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NINE Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the KLXE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINE and KLXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NINEKLXEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

0.63

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

-0.30

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

-0.40

+0.38

Drawdowns

NINE vs. KLXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NINE drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, roughly equal to the maximum KLXE drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINE and KLXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NINEKLXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.19%

-99.11%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.93%

-46.13%

-26.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.81%

-87.64%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.06%

-91.22%

-6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.56%

-98.26%

+26.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.18%

-86.66%

+6.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.79%

29.99%

+13.80%

Volatility

NINE vs. KLXE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) is 10.35%, while KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE) has a volatility of 26.80%. This indicates that NINE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NINEKLXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.35%

26.80%

-16.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

269.22%

76.35%

+192.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1,318.80%

98.30%

+1,220.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

594.71%

90.64%

+504.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

465.60%

99.35%

+366.25%

Dividends

NINE vs. KLXE - Dividend Comparison

Neither NINE nor KLXE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NINE vs. KLXE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nine Energy Service, Inc. and KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
130.00M
144.70M
(NINE) Total Revenue
(KLXE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NINE vs. KLXE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nine Energy Service, Inc. and KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
4.3%
17.7%
Portfolio components
NINE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nine Energy Service, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.63M and revenue of 130.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.3%.

KLXE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.60M and revenue of 144.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.7%.

NINE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nine Energy Service, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.08M and revenue of 130.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.7%.

KLXE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.80M and revenue of 144.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

NINE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nine Energy Service, Inc. reported a net income of 106.63M and revenue of 130.00M, resulting in a net margin of 82.0%.

KLXE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -24.00M and revenue of 144.70M, resulting in a net margin of -16.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NINE and KLXE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KLXE has higher volatility (26.80%) compared to NINE (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NINE dropped -99.19% vs KLXE's -99.11%.

NINE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NINE and KLXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer