NINE vs. KLXE

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) and KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE).

Performance

NINE vs. KLXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) and KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NINE vs. KLXE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NINE Nine Energy Service, Inc.	2,245.96%	-69.13%	-58.21%	-81.56%	1,353.00%	-63.24%	-65.22%	-65.31%	-25.61%
KLXE KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.	31.75%	-62.05%	-55.77%	-34.95%	458.39%	-52.01%	-79.94%	-72.54%	-21.81%

Fundamentals

EPS NINE : -$1.00 KLXE : -$4.02
PS Ratio NINE : 0.58 KLXE : 0.08
Total Revenue (TTM) NINE : $571.17M KLXE : $636.50M
Gross Profit (TTM) NINE : $65.70M KLXE : $135.10M
EBITDA (TTM) NINE : $61.81M KLXE : $64.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NINE achieves a 2,245.96% return, which is significantly higher than KLXE's 31.75% return.

NINE

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 1,283.25%
• YTD: 2,245.96%
• 6M: 1,143.67%
• 1Y: 679.81%
• 3Y*: 9.36%
• 5Y*: 29.23%
• 10Y*: —

KLXE

• 1D: 3.32%
• 1M: -3.11%
• YTD: 31.75%
• 6M: 25.76%
• 1Y: -19.16%
• 3Y*: -42.84%
• 5Y*: -32.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NINE vs. KLXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NINE

NINE Risk / Return Rank: 88
NINE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
NINE Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
NINE Omega Ratio Rank: 100
NINE Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NINE Martin Ratio Rank: 88

KLXE

KLXE Risk / Return Rank: 31
KLXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
KLXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
KLXE Omega Ratio Rank: 36
KLXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
KLXE Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NINE vs. KLXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) and KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NINE	KLXE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	-0.26	+0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	17.54	0.33	+17.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.24	1.04	+2.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.04	-0.45	+7.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.25	-0.60	+10.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NINE vs. KLXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NINE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the KLXE Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINE and KLXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NINE	KLXE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	-0.26	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	-0.35	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	-0.42	+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between NINE and KLXE is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NINE vs. KLXE - Dividend Comparison

Neither NINE nor KLXE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NINE vs. KLXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NINE drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, roughly equal to the maximum KLXE drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINE and KLXE.

Drawdown Indicators

	NINE	KLXE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.19%	-99.11%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.93%	-46.13%	-26.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.06%	-91.22%	-6.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.24%	-98.56%	+19.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.28%	-86.41%	+6.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	51.58%	41.49%	+10.09%

Volatility

NINE vs. KLXE - Volatility Comparison

Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) has a higher volatility of 263.88% compared to KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE) at 22.72%. This indicates that NINE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NINE	KLXE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	263.88%	22.72%	+241.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	274.33%	66.00%	+208.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1,319.84%	104.94%	+1,214.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	594.58%	91.54%	+503.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	470.30%	99.05%	+371.25%

Financials

NINE vs. KLXE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nine Energy Service, Inc. and KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NINE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nine Energy Service, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.75M and revenue of 132.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.9%.

KLXE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 59.00M and revenue of 156.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.

NINE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nine Energy Service, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.17M and revenue of 132.03M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.9%.

KLXE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 94.30M and revenue of 156.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 60.1%.

NINE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nine Energy Service, Inc. reported a net income of -14.65M and revenue of 132.03M, resulting in a net margin of -11.1%.

KLXE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -15.00M and revenue of 156.80M, resulting in a net margin of -9.6%.