PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FZILX vs. NINDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FZILX and NINDX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

FZILX vs. NINDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.01%
3.70%
FZILX
NINDX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FZILX:

1.20

NINDX:

1.13

Sortino Ratio

FZILX:

1.71

NINDX:

1.51

Omega Ratio

FZILX:

1.21

NINDX:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

FZILX:

1.51

NINDX:

0.82

Martin Ratio

FZILX:

3.75

NINDX:

4.37

Ulcer Index

FZILX:

3.95%

NINDX:

3.57%

Daily Std Dev

FZILX:

12.39%

NINDX:

13.83%

Max Drawdown

FZILX:

-34.37%

NINDX:

-55.32%

Current Drawdown

FZILX:

-1.05%

NINDX:

-5.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZILX achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly higher than NINDX's 4.34% return.


FZILX

YTD

8.12%

1M

6.80%

6M

4.01%

1Y

13.36%

5Y*

6.29%

10Y*

N/A

NINDX

YTD

4.34%

1M

2.30%

6M

3.71%

1Y

15.41%

5Y*

4.13%

10Y*

6.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FZILX vs. NINDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZILX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NINDX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


NINDX
Columbia Large Cap Index Fund
Expense ratio chart for NINDX: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for FZILX: current value at 0.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FZILX vs. NINDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZILX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FZILX is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FZILX is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FZILX is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FZILX is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FZILX is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FZILX is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

NINDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NINDX is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NINDX is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NINDX is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NINDX is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NINDX is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NINDX is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FZILX vs. NINDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FZILX, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.201.13
The chart of Sortino ratio for FZILX, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.711.51
The chart of Omega ratio for FZILX, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.211.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for FZILX, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.510.82
The chart of Martin ratio for FZILX, currently valued at 3.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.003.754.37
FZILX
NINDX

The current FZILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the NINDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZILX and NINDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.20
1.13
FZILX
NINDX

Dividends

FZILX vs. NINDX - Dividend Comparison

FZILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than NINDX's 1.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.78%3.00%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.83%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NINDX
Columbia Large Cap Index Fund
1.22%1.27%1.43%1.71%1.27%1.60%1.93%2.19%1.78%1.94%2.42%1.71%

Drawdowns

FZILX vs. NINDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZILX drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, smaller than the maximum NINDX drawdown of -55.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZILX and NINDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.05%
-5.92%
FZILX
NINDX

Volatility

FZILX vs. NINDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) have volatilities of 3.25% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.25%
3.19%
FZILX
NINDX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab