PortfoliosLab logo
NICE vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NICE and SCHG is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

NICE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NICE Ltd. (NICE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
445.34%
814.06%
NICE
SCHG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NICE:

-0.78

SCHG:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

NICE:

-0.93

SCHG:

0.91

Omega Ratio

NICE:

0.88

SCHG:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

NICE:

-0.58

SCHG:

0.58

Martin Ratio

NICE:

-1.27

SCHG:

2.03

Ulcer Index

NICE:

25.49%

SCHG:

6.67%

Daily Std Dev

NICE:

41.38%

SCHG:

25.02%

Max Drawdown

NICE:

-93.23%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

NICE:

-50.43%

SCHG:

-13.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NICE achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.34% return. Over the past 10 years, NICE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 10.21%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.97% annualized return.


NICE

YTD

-8.05%

1M

0.44%

6M

-13.19%

1Y

-30.74%

5Y*

-1.64%

10Y*

10.21%

SCHG

YTD

-9.34%

1M

0.88%

6M

-4.94%

1Y

11.94%

5Y*

17.84%

10Y*

14.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NICE vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NICE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NICE is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NICE is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NICE is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NICE is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NICE is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NICE is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NICE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NICE Ltd. (NICE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for NICE, currently valued at -0.78, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
NICE: -0.78
SCHG: 0.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for NICE, currently valued at -0.93, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
NICE: -0.93
SCHG: 0.91
The chart of Omega ratio for NICE, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
NICE: 0.88
SCHG: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for NICE, currently valued at -0.58, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
NICE: -0.58
SCHG: 0.58
The chart of Martin ratio for NICE, currently valued at -1.27, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
NICE: -1.27
SCHG: 2.03

The current NICE Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NICE and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.78
0.54
NICE
SCHG

Dividends

NICE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

NICE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NICE
NICE Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.93%1.12%1.26%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

NICE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NICE drawdown since its inception was -93.23%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICE and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-50.43%
-13.18%
NICE
SCHG

Volatility

NICE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NICE Ltd. (NICE) is 14.98%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that NICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.98%
16.60%
NICE
SCHG