PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHC vs. ^SP500TR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NHC vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHC achieves a 52.73% return, which is significantly higher than ^SP500TR's 10.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NHC having a 15.28% annualized return and ^SP500TR not far behind at 15.18%.


NHC

1D
-1.19%
1M
5.48%
6M
56.35%
YTD
52.73%
1Y
104.77%
3Y*
56.80%
5Y*
27.26%
10Y*
15.28%

^SP500TR

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.22%
6M
8.34%
YTD
10.48%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHC vs. ^SP500TR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHC
National HealthCare Corporation
52.73%30.34%19.05%60.84%-9.42%5.39%-20.66%13.02%32.43%-17.26%
^SP500TR
S&P 500 Total Return
10.48%17.88%25.02%26.29%-18.11%28.71%18.40%31.49%-4.38%21.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NHC and ^SP500TR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1988

0.32

The correlation between NHC and ^SP500TR shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHC vs. ^SP500TR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHC
NHC Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHC Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
NHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP500TR
^SP500TR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHC vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NHC^SP500TRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.31

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.45

2.43

+8.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.13

10.66

+14.46

NHC vs. ^SP500TR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHC Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHC and ^SP500TR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NHC vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHC drawdown since its inception was -96.33%, which is greater than ^SP500TR's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHC and ^SP500TR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHC^SP500TRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.33%

-55.25%

-41.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-8.89%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.40%

-18.75%

-14.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-24.49%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

-33.79%

-1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-1.11%

-3.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.37%

-8.15%

-18.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

2.02%

+2.17%

Volatility

NHC vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison

National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) at 3.97%. This indicates that NHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP500TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHC^SP500TRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.64%

3.97%

+4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.73%

9.99%

+15.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.56%

12.57%

+19.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.82%

17.01%

+10.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.31%

18.05%

+10.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHC and ^SP500TR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NHC has higher volatility (8.64%) compared to ^SP500TR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHC dropped -96.33% vs ^SP500TR's -55.25%.

NHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHC and ^SP500TR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer