PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NGT.TO vs. AEM.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


NGT.TOAEM.TO
YTD Return8.93%51.88%
1Y Return27.56%70.96%
3Y Return (Ann)-4.67%17.75%
5Y Return (Ann)6.08%9.04%
Sharpe Ratio0.802.51
Sortino Ratio1.253.13
Omega Ratio1.181.41
Calmar Ratio0.471.65
Martin Ratio2.7413.31
Ulcer Index10.39%5.24%
Daily Std Dev35.80%27.81%
Max Drawdown-60.38%-84.31%
Current Drawdown-41.47%-12.07%

Fundamentals


NGT.TOAEM.TO
Market CapCA$67.09BCA$54.57B
EPS-CA$3.05CA$2.74
PEG Ratio1.2428.26
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$12.38BCA$7.82B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$3.88BCA$3.18B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$3.91BCA$2.89B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between NGT.TO and AEM.TO is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

NGT.TO vs. AEM.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, NGT.TO achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than AEM.TO's 51.88% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.29%
14.70%
NGT.TO
AEM.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NGT.TO vs. AEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NGT.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NGT.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NGT.TO, currently valued at 0.73, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.73
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NGT.TO, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NGT.TO, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NGT.TO, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NGT.TO, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.41
AEM.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 2.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.56
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 11.48, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.48

NGT.TO vs. AEM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NGT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NGT.TO and AEM.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.73
2.29
NGT.TO
AEM.TO

Dividends

NGT.TO vs. AEM.TO - Dividend Comparison

NGT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than AEM.TO's 1.47% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
NGT.TO
Newmont Corporation
1.95%2.92%3.45%2.80%1.37%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.47%2.20%2.27%2.71%1.06%0.69%0.80%0.71%0.82%0.88%1.42%3.97%

Drawdowns

NGT.TO vs. AEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGT.TO drawdown since its inception was -60.38%, smaller than the maximum AEM.TO drawdown of -84.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGT.TO and AEM.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-46.96%
-12.13%
NGT.TO
AEM.TO

Volatility

NGT.TO vs. AEM.TO - Volatility Comparison

Newmont Corporation (NGT.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.54% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) at 11.32%. This indicates that NGT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.54%
11.32%
NGT.TO
AEM.TO

Financials

NGT.TO vs. AEM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Corporation and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items