PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NGS vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NGS and SMH is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

NGS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
33.93%
0.65%
NGS
SMH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NGS:

2.22

SMH:

1.38

Sortino Ratio

NGS:

2.94

SMH:

1.90

Omega Ratio

NGS:

1.34

SMH:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

NGS:

1.59

SMH:

1.96

Martin Ratio

NGS:

8.10

SMH:

4.70

Ulcer Index

NGS:

12.55%

SMH:

10.32%

Daily Std Dev

NGS:

45.81%

SMH:

35.08%

Max Drawdown

NGS:

-89.59%

SMH:

-83.29%

Current Drawdown

NGS:

-28.91%

SMH:

-7.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NGS achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, NGS has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 3.11%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 26.76% annualized return.


NGS

YTD

4.44%

1M

16.77%

6M

36.54%

1Y

96.56%

5Y*

19.05%

10Y*

3.11%

SMH

YTD

6.64%

1M

7.19%

6M

4.54%

1Y

43.86%

5Y*

29.70%

10Y*

26.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NGS vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NGS is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NGS is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NGS is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NGS is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NGS is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NGS is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMH is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMH is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMH is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMH is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMH is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMH is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NGS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NGS, currently valued at 2.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.221.38
The chart of Sortino ratio for NGS, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.941.90
The chart of Omega ratio for NGS, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.341.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for NGS, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.591.96
The chart of Martin ratio for NGS, currently valued at 8.10, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.008.104.70
NGS
SMH

The current NGS Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NGS and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.22
1.38
NGS
SMH

Dividends

NGS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

NGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.41%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%1.16%

Drawdowns

NGS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGS drawdown since its inception was -89.59%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGS and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-28.91%
-7.78%
NGS
SMH

Volatility

NGS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) has a higher volatility of 12.89% compared to VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 8.78%. This indicates that NGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
12.89%
8.78%
NGS
SMH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab