NGS vs. MLR
NGS (Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.) and MLR (Miller Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. NGS operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while MLR operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, NGS returned 6.52%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for MLR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NGS vs. MLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NGS achieves a 29.60% return, which is significantly lower than MLR's 34.30% return. Over the past 10 years, NGS has underperformed MLR with an annualized return of 6.52%, while MLR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.
NGS
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 29.60%
- 6M
- 33.44%
- 1Y
- 63.19%
- 3Y*
- 64.85%
- 5Y*
- 32.53%
- 10Y*
- 6.52%
MLR
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 7.28%
- YTD
- 34.30%
- 6M
- 32.08%
- 1Y
- 15.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
NGS vs. MLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGS Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. | 29.60% | 26.53% | 66.67% | 40.31% | 9.46% | 10.44% | -22.68% | -25.43% | -37.25% | -18.51% |
MLR Miller Industries, Inc. | 34.30% | -41.73% | 56.58% | 61.77% | -17.93% | -10.51% | 4.82% | 40.68% | 7.49% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between NGS and MLR is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2002 | 0.26 |
The correlation between NGS and MLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NGS:
$552.28M
MLR:
$573.29M
NGS:
$1.72
MLR:
$1.34
NGS:
25.18
MLR:
37.12
NGS:
0.13
MLR:
0.95
NGS:
3.06
MLR:
0.77
NGS:
1.97
MLR:
1.37
NGS:
$179.40M
MLR:
$744.73M
NGS:
$87.76M
MLR:
$112.13M
NGS:
$69.86M
MLR:
$33.28M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NGS vs. MLR — Risk / Return Rank
NGS
MLR
NGS vs. MLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) and Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NGS | MLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.11 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 0.70 | +4.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | 1.48 | +12.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NGS vs. MLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NGS drawdown since its inception was -89.59%, smaller than the maximum MLR drawdown of -98.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGS and MLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NGS | MLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.59% | -98.14% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -22.80% | +9.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.89% | -52.70% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.89% | -52.70% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.91% | -53.25% | -34.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -34.12% | +33.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.53% | -69.58% | +22.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | 10.84% | -6.18% |
Volatility
NGS vs. MLR - Volatility Comparison
Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) at 7.51%. This indicates that NGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NGS | MLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 7.51% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.41% | 19.02% | +3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.05% | 29.13% | +3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.10% | 30.58% | +13.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.23% | 30.98% | +15.25% |
Dividends
NGS vs. MLR - Dividend Comparison
NGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than MLR's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLR Miller Industries, Inc. | 1.65% | 2.14% | 1.16% | 1.70% | 2.70% | 2.16% | 1.89% | 1.94% | 2.67% | 2.79% | 2.57% | 2.94% |
NGS Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. | 1.08% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NGS vs. MLR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. and Miller Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NGS vs. MLR - Profitability Comparison
NGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 30.25M and revenue of 48.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.4%.
MLR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.68M and revenue of 180.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.2%.
NGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.07M and revenue of 48.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.0%.
MLR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.73M and revenue of 180.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
NGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. reported a net income of 6.76M and revenue of 48.47M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
MLR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00K and revenue of 180.86M, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NGS and MLR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NGS has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to MLR (7.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NGS dropped -89.59% vs MLR's -98.14%.
NGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NGS and MLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer