NGS vs. JSPR
NGS (Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.) and JSPR (Jasper Therapeutics, Inc.) are both stocks. NGS operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while JSPR operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, NGS returned 53.13%/yr vs -65.47%/yr for JSPR. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NGS vs. JSPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NGS achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly higher than JSPR's -65.57% return.
NGS
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -7.15%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 59.56%
- 3Y*
- 53.13%
- 5Y*
- 30.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
JSPR
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 47.09%
- 6M
- -57.43%
- YTD
- -65.57%
- 1Y
- -78.12%
- 3Y*
- -65.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -66.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $659.53K | $2.46M | $1.04M | |
| $5.23M | $4.86M | $5.26M |
NGS vs. JSPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGS Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. | 9.59% | 26.53% | 66.67% | 40.31% | 9.46% | 9.29% |
JSPR Jasper Therapeutics, Inc. | -65.57% | -91.44% | 170.98% | 63.39% | -93.85% | -37.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between NGS and JSPR is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
NGS:
$462.93M
JSPR:
$10.24M
NGS:
$1.72
JSPR:
-$2.70
NGS:
1.66
JSPR:
5.31
NGS:
$179.40M
JSPR:
$0.00
NGS:
$87.76M
JSPR:
-$290.00K
NGS:
$69.86M
JSPR:
-$72.26M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NGS vs. JSPR — Risk / Return Rank
NGS
JSPR
NGS vs. JSPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) and Jasper Therapeutics, Inc. (JSPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NGS | JSPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.83 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | -0.88 | +3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.78 | -1.40 | +12.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NGS vs. JSPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NGS drawdown since its inception was -89.59%, smaller than the maximum JSPR drawdown of -99.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGS and JSPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NGS | JSPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.59% | -99.79% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.49% | -89.04% | +69.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.89% | -98.86% | +57.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.97% | -99.62% | +82.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.35% | -88.74% | +41.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 55.83% | -50.78% |
Volatility
NGS vs. JSPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) is 13.15%, while Jasper Therapeutics, Inc. (JSPR) has a volatility of 35.25%. This indicates that NGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NGS | JSPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.15% | 35.25% | -22.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.22% | 86.80% | -61.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.59% | 98.74% | -64.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.17% | 240.00% | -195.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 240.00% | -193.70% |
Dividends
NGS vs. JSPR - Dividend Comparison
NGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while JSPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
JSPR Jasper Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NGS Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. | 1.28% | 0.62% |
Financials
NGS vs. JSPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. and Jasper Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NGS and JSPR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSPR has higher volatility (35.25%) compared to NGS (13.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NGS dropped -89.59% vs JSPR's -99.79%.
NGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NGS and JSPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer