PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFRA vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFRA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFRA achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, NFRA has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.88%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.17% annualized return.


NFRA

1D
0.53%
1M
1.61%
6M
6.94%
YTD
9.49%
1Y
14.30%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
6.88%
ALL TIME*
6.94%

VOO

1D
1.42%
1M
1.69%
6M
9.53%
YTD
11.72%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
15.17%
ALL TIME*
14.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.37M$2.66M$4.22M
$3.97B$3.80B$5.49B

NFRA vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
9.49%18.42%4.76%8.96%-10.11%9.61%2.24%26.27%-7.74%15.92%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.72%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NFRA and VOO is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2013

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between NFRA and VOO has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NFRA vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NFRA
VOO

Industrials

33.4%
8.5%

Utilities

24.5%
2.2%

Communication Services

22.4%
9.9%

Energy

9.1%
3.0%

Real Estate

4.7%
1.8%

Healthcare

4.5%
8.9%

Technology

1.3%
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
4.5%

Financial Services

0.0%
11.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Industrials

NFRA
33.4%
VOO
8.5%

Utilities

NFRA
24.5%
VOO
2.2%

Communication Services

NFRA
22.4%
VOO
9.9%

Energy

NFRA
9.1%
VOO
3.0%

Real Estate

NFRA
4.7%
VOO
1.8%

Healthcare

NFRA
4.5%
VOO
8.9%

Technology

NFRA
1.3%
VOO
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NFRA
0.3%
VOO
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

NFRA
0.1%
VOO
4.5%

Financial Services

NFRA
0.0%
VOO
11.4%

Basic Materials

NFRA

-

VOO
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFRA vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NFRA
NFRA Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NFRA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFRAVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.63

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

11.23

-5.36

NFRA vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFRA and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFRA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFRA drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRA and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFRAVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-33.99%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-8.90%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.16%

-18.69%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-24.52%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.49%

-33.99%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

0.00%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-3.67%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.08%

+0.36%

Volatility

NFRA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) is 1.93%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that NFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFRAVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

3.81%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

10.18%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

12.80%

-2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.96%

16.95%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.87%

18.02%

-3.15%

NFRA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFRA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
5.65%6.00%3.33%2.57%2.28%2.71%2.22%2.27%3.06%2.81%2.98%2.47%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFRA and VOO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to NFRA (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFRA dropped -32.49% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.17% vs 6.88% for NFRA. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, NFRA has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.17% return vs 6.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for NFRA.

NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

NFRA is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. NFRA tracks STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for NFRA and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFRA and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer