PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NFLY vs. QDTE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


NFLYQDTE
Daily Std Dev24.35%17.27%
Max Drawdown-21.44%-10.74%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between NFLY and QDTE is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

NFLY vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
30.17%
19.53%
NFLY
QDTE

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NFLY vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.


NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for NFLY: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for QDTE: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NFLY vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NFLY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NFLY, currently valued at 2.65, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.65
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NFLY, currently valued at 3.79, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.79
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NFLY, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NFLY, currently valued at 6.60, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NFLY, currently valued at 21.79, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0021.79
QDTE
Sharpe ratio
No data

NFLY vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

NFLY vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

NFLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.84%, more than QDTE's 23.01% yield.


TTM2023
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
44.84%11.84%
QDTE
Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
23.01%0.00%

Drawdowns

NFLY vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLY drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -10.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLY and QDTE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
NFLY
QDTE

Volatility

NFLY vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) at 4.81%. This indicates that NFLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.99%
4.81%
NFLY
QDTE