PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFG vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFG vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFG achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, NFG has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 6.69%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.48% annualized return.


NFG

1D
-0.18%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
-2.89%
6M
-4.80%
1Y
-3.20%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
6.69%

XLV

1D
3.07%
1M
4.67%
YTD
-1.35%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
16.13%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFG vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
-2.89%35.31%25.38%-17.71%1.87%60.66%-7.58%-5.94%-3.74%-0.20%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-1.35%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NFG and XLV is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between NFG and XLV has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFG vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFG
NFG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
NFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFG vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NFGXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.19

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

1.55

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

3.73

-4.08

NFG vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFG Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFG and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFGXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

1.08

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.42

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.57

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.46

-0.08

Drawdowns

NFG vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFG drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFG and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFGXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.49%

-39.17%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.36%

-10.47%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.36%

-17.11%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.74%

-17.11%

-18.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

-28.40%

-15.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.45%

-4.68%

-14.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.30%

-7.12%

-7.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.18%

4.33%

+4.85%

Volatility

NFG vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.04%. This indicates that NFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFGXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

5.04%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

10.67%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.90%

14.97%

+4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

14.76%

+7.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.04%

16.57%

+7.47%

Dividends

NFG vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

NFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than XLV's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
2.77%2.65%3.36%3.91%2.97%2.83%4.30%3.72%3.30%3.00%2.84%3.67%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.65%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFG and XLV have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFG has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to XLV (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFG dropped -55.49% vs XLV's -39.17%.

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFG and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer