NFG vs. XLV
NFG (National Fuel Gas Company) is a stock, while XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, NFG returned 7.11%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for XLV. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NFG vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFG achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's 5.16% return. Over the past 10 years, NFG has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 7.11%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.
NFG
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- 5.07%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 0.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 7.11%
XLV
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 21.48%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
NFG vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFG National Fuel Gas Company | 2.36% | 35.31% | 25.38% | -17.71% | 1.87% | 60.66% | -7.58% | -5.94% | -3.74% | -0.20% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.16% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFG and XLV is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.36 |
The correlation between NFG and XLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFG vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
NFG
XLV
NFG vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFG | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.24 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 2.06 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.02 | 4.88 | -4.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFG vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFG drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFG and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFG | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.49% | -39.17% | -16.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.93% | -10.47% | -10.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.93% | -17.11% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.74% | -17.11% | -18.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.28% | -28.40% | -15.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.10% | -1.84% | -13.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -7.11% | -7.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.94% | 4.41% | +6.53% |
Volatility
NFG vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) have volatilities of 5.69% and 5.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFG | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 5.76% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.31% | 11.53% | +2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | 15.75% | +4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 14.93% | +7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.04% | 16.61% | +7.43% |
Dividends
NFG vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
NFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than XLV's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFG National Fuel Gas Company | 2.67% | 2.65% | 3.36% | 3.91% | 2.97% | 2.83% | 4.30% | 3.72% | 3.30% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 3.67% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.57% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFG and XLV have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to NFG (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFG dropped -55.49% vs XLV's -39.17%.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFG and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer