PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFE vs. CNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NFE vs. CNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFE achieves a -56.12% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ's 42.17% return.


NFE

1D
-3.81%
1M
-38.83%
YTD
-56.12%
6M
-63.75%
1Y
-81.88%
3Y*
-73.98%
5Y*
-57.16%
10Y*

CNQ

1D
1.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
42.17%
6M
42.84%
1Y
59.14%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
27.16%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFE vs. CNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NFE
New Fortress Energy Inc.
-56.12%-92.46%-59.24%-1.71%77.41%-54.42%243.98%19.89%
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
42.17%15.58%-1.31%23.72%42.82%83.55%-19.06%25.52%

Correlation

The correlation between NFE and CNQ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2019

0.34

The correlation between NFE and CNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NFE:

$142.33M

CNQ:

$99.96B

EPS

NFE:

-$6.58

CNQ:

$4.65

PS Ratio

NFE:

0.09

CNQ:

2.44

PB Ratio

NFE:

0.78

CNQ:

2.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

NFE:

$1.50B

CNQ:

$40.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NFE:

$310.12M

CNQ:

$12.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

NFE:

-$198.72M

CNQ:

$22.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFE vs. CNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFE
NFE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

CNQ
CNQ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFE vs. CNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NFECNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.33

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

4.20

-5.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

9.68

-10.93

NFE vs. CNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFE Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the CNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFE and CNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFECNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

2.07

-2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.64

0.83

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.41

-0.83

Drawdowns

NFE vs. CNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFE drawdown since its inception was -99.09%, which is greater than CNQ's maximum drawdown of -80.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFE and CNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFECNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.09%

-80.75%

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.05%

-14.16%

-74.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.72%

-35.85%

-62.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.09%

-35.85%

-63.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.09%

-4.80%

-94.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.01%

-23.53%

-22.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

65.43%

6.13%

+59.30%

Volatility

NFE vs. CNQ - Volatility Comparison

New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE) has a higher volatility of 20.11% compared to Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) at 9.27%. This indicates that NFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFECNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.11%

9.27%

+10.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.76%

23.57%

+45.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.28%

28.73%

+102.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.68%

32.79%

+56.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.57%

40.27%

+43.30%

Dividends

NFE vs. CNQ - Dividend Comparison

NFE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
3.65%5.01%5.02%4.17%6.31%3.78%5.26%3.49%4.56%3.08%2.94%4.21%
NFE
New Fortress Energy Inc.
0.00%0.00%1.98%10.46%0.94%1.66%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NFE vs. CNQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New Fortress Energy Inc. and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
404.44M
10.84B
(NFE) Total Revenue
(CNQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NFE and CNQ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFE has higher volatility (20.11%) compared to CNQ (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFE dropped -99.09% vs CNQ's -80.75%.

CNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFE and CNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer