PortfoliosLab logo
NETZ vs. NLR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NETZ and NLR is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

NETZ vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Systems ETF (NETZ) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NETZ:

0.64

NLR:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

NETZ:

0.90

NLR:

0.75

Omega Ratio

NETZ:

1.13

NLR:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

NETZ:

0.58

NLR:

0.41

Martin Ratio

NETZ:

1.89

NLR:

0.99

Ulcer Index

NETZ:

7.91%

NLR:

12.50%

Daily Std Dev

NETZ:

26.71%

NLR:

35.45%

Max Drawdown

NETZ:

-25.87%

NLR:

-66.96%

Current Drawdown

NETZ:

-1.08%

NLR:

-2.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NETZ achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 19.49% return.


NETZ

YTD

13.35%

1M

14.02%

6M

5.98%

1Y

16.41%

3Y*

18.32%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

NLR

YTD

19.49%

1M

21.52%

6M

2.67%

1Y

12.83%

3Y*

22.69%

5Y*

19.63%

10Y*

9.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TCW Transform Systems ETF

NETZ vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NETZ vs. NLR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NETZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NETZ is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NETZ is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NETZ is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NETZ is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NETZ is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NETZ is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NLR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NLR is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NLR is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NLR is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NLR is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NLR is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NLR is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NETZ vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (NETZ) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NETZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NETZ and NLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NETZ vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

NETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than NLR's 0.63% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NETZ
TCW Transform Systems ETF
0.44%0.49%0.78%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NLR
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
0.63%0.75%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.43%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%2.48%

Drawdowns

NETZ vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NETZ drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -66.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETZ and NLR.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NETZ vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW Transform Systems ETF (NETZ) is 5.04%, while VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 10.77%. This indicates that NETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...