PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NESF.L vs. GCP.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


NESF.LGCP.L
YTD Return-11.30%9.12%
1Y Return-1.35%23.72%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.18%-5.33%
5Y Return (Ann)-2.06%-4.38%
10Y Return (Ann)1.90%1.87%
Sharpe Ratio-0.090.95
Sortino Ratio0.001.49
Omega Ratio1.001.18
Calmar Ratio-0.050.53
Martin Ratio-0.134.34
Ulcer Index12.25%4.51%
Daily Std Dev17.90%20.86%
Max Drawdown-34.88%-44.22%
Current Drawdown-26.14%-24.98%

Fundamentals


NESF.LGCP.L
Market Cap£451.44M£621.35M
EPS£0.01-£1.74
Total Revenue (TTM)£12.00M£19.92M
Gross Profit (TTM)£12.00M£15.73M
EBITDA (TTM)-£4.99M-£4.35M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between NESF.L and GCP.L is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

NESF.L vs. GCP.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, NESF.L achieves a -11.30% return, which is significantly lower than GCP.L's 9.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NESF.L having a 1.90% annualized return and GCP.L not far behind at 1.87%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.84%
0.05%
NESF.L
GCP.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NESF.L vs. GCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NextEnergy Solar Fund Ltd (NESF.L) and GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NESF.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NESF.L, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.16
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NESF.L, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.38
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NESF.L, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NESF.L, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.10
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NESF.L, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.26
GCP.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GCP.L, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GCP.L, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GCP.L, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GCP.L, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.68
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GCP.L, currently valued at 6.13, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.13

NESF.L vs. GCP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NESF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the GCP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NESF.L and GCP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.16
1.14
NESF.L
GCP.L

Dividends

NESF.L vs. GCP.L - Dividend Comparison

NESF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.07%, more than GCP.L's 9.78% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
NESF.L
NextEnergy Solar Fund Ltd
11.07%8.58%6.60%6.99%6.53%5.45%5.69%146.26%582.83%550.24%253.01%0.00%
GCP.L
GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited
9.78%9.72%6.86%6.46%6.97%5.77%4.50%5.89%6.18%6.33%6.22%6.74%

Drawdowns

NESF.L vs. GCP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NESF.L drawdown since its inception was -34.88%, smaller than the maximum GCP.L drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESF.L and GCP.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-18.89%
-24.03%
NESF.L
GCP.L

Volatility

NESF.L vs. GCP.L - Volatility Comparison

NextEnergy Solar Fund Ltd (NESF.L) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L) at 5.35%. This indicates that NESF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.22%
5.35%
NESF.L
GCP.L

Financials

NESF.L vs. GCP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NextEnergy Solar Fund Ltd and GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items