NEM vs. SBSW
Compare and contrast key facts about Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) and Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NEM or SBSW.
Correlation
The correlation between NEM and SBSW is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
NEM vs. SBSW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NEM:
1.21
SBSW:
-0.10
NEM:
1.71
SBSW:
0.33
NEM:
1.25
SBSW:
1.04
NEM:
0.89
SBSW:
-0.08
NEM:
2.59
SBSW:
-0.25
NEM:
17.92%
SBSW:
26.79%
NEM:
38.36%
SBSW:
66.11%
NEM:
-77.55%
SBSW:
-83.67%
NEM:
-29.98%
SBSW:
-75.11%
Fundamentals
NEM:
$60.04B
SBSW:
$3.50B
NEM:
$4.39
SBSW:
-$0.55
NEM:
3.05
SBSW:
0.03
NEM:
1.98
SBSW:
1.41
NEM:
$19.65B
SBSW:
$112.13B
NEM:
$7.72B
SBSW:
$15.73B
NEM:
$6.55B
SBSW:
$164.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a 45.78% return, which is significantly higher than SBSW's 37.27% return. Over the past 10 years, NEM has outperformed SBSW with an annualized return of 10.01%, while SBSW has yielded a comparatively lower 0.45% annualized return.
NEM
45.78%
13.82%
12.73%
27.11%
0.10%
10.01%
SBSW
37.27%
4.14%
-8.11%
-6.60%
-6.60%
0.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NEM vs. SBSW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NEM
SBSW
NEM vs. SBSW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) and Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NEM vs. SBSW - Dividend Comparison
NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while SBSW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation | 1.85% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% | 1.19% |
SBSW Sibanye Stillwater Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.96% | 7.68% | 13.34% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.76% | 10.25% | 6.12% | 9.44% |
Drawdowns
NEM vs. SBSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -77.55%, smaller than the maximum SBSW drawdown of -83.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and SBSW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NEM vs. SBSW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) is 16.95%, while Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) has a volatility of 33.16%. This indicates that NEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NEM vs. SBSW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Goldcorp Corporation and Sibanye Stillwater Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities