PortfoliosLab logo
NEM vs. SBSW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NEM and SBSW is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NEM vs. SBSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) and Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NEM:

0.46

SBSW:

-0.16

Sortino Ratio

NEM:

0.83

SBSW:

0.26

Omega Ratio

NEM:

1.12

SBSW:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

NEM:

0.33

SBSW:

-0.11

Martin Ratio

NEM:

0.95

SBSW:

-0.34

Ulcer Index

NEM:

18.04%

SBSW:

27.05%

Daily Std Dev

NEM:

37.00%

SBSW:

65.77%

Max Drawdown

NEM:

-77.55%

SBSW:

-83.67%

Current Drawdown

NEM:

-36.83%

SBSW:

-74.89%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEM:

$55.73B

SBSW:

$3.55B

EPS

NEM:

$4.39

SBSW:

-$0.57

PS Ratio

NEM:

2.83

SBSW:

0.03

PB Ratio

NEM:

1.92

SBSW:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEM:

$19.65B

SBSW:

$169.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEM:

$7.72B

SBSW:

$24.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

NEM:

$9.78B

SBSW:

-$4.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a 31.51% return, which is significantly lower than SBSW's 38.48% return. Over the past 10 years, NEM has outperformed SBSW with an annualized return of 8.34%, while SBSW has yielded a comparatively lower 2.29% annualized return.


NEM

YTD

31.51%

1M

-11.19%

6M

19.43%

1Y

16.93%

5Y*

-3.38%

10Y*

8.34%

SBSW

YTD

38.48%

1M

3.16%

6M

13.40%

1Y

-10.22%

5Y*

-6.23%

10Y*

2.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NEM vs. SBSW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NEM is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NEM is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NEM is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NEM is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NEM is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NEM is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SBSW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SBSW is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SBSW is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SBSW is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SBSW is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SBSW is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SBSW is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NEM vs. SBSW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) and Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the SBSW Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEM and SBSW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NEM vs. SBSW - Dividend Comparison

NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, while SBSW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
2.06%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%1.19%
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
0.00%0.00%6.96%7.68%13.34%0.76%0.00%0.00%3.76%10.25%6.12%9.44%

Drawdowns

NEM vs. SBSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -77.55%, smaller than the maximum SBSW drawdown of -83.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and SBSW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NEM vs. SBSW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) is 11.57%, while Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) has a volatility of 17.27%. This indicates that NEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NEM vs. SBSW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Goldcorp Corporation and Sibanye Stillwater Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
5.01B
56.93B
(NEM) Total Revenue
(SBSW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NEM vs. SBSW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Newmont Goldcorp Corporation and Sibanye Stillwater Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
46.1%
15.1%
(NEM) Gross Margin
(SBSW) Gross Margin
NEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.31B and revenue of 5.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.1%.

SBSW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sibanye Stillwater Limited reported a gross profit of 8.59B and revenue of 56.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

NEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported an operating income of 2.02B and revenue of 5.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.2%.

SBSW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sibanye Stillwater Limited reported an operating income of 8.46B and revenue of 56.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

NEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported a net income of 1.89B and revenue of 5.01B, resulting in a net margin of 37.7%.

SBSW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sibanye Stillwater Limited reported a net income of 175.00M and revenue of 56.93B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.