PortfoliosLab logo
NEEGX vs. RING
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NEEGX and RING is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NEEGX vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NEEGX:

-0.87

RING:

1.51

Sortino Ratio

NEEGX:

-1.14

RING:

2.20

Omega Ratio

NEEGX:

0.86

RING:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

NEEGX:

-0.67

RING:

1.42

Martin Ratio

NEEGX:

-1.53

RING:

6.13

Ulcer Index

NEEGX:

17.79%

RING:

9.34%

Daily Std Dev

NEEGX:

31.80%

RING:

34.50%

Max Drawdown

NEEGX:

-60.83%

RING:

-79.48%

Current Drawdown

NEEGX:

-32.64%

RING:

-3.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEEGX achieves a -17.49% return, which is significantly lower than RING's 50.59% return. Over the past 10 years, NEEGX has underperformed RING with an annualized return of 0.63%, while RING has yielded a comparatively higher 11.38% annualized return.


NEEGX

YTD

-17.49%

1M

0.60%

6M

-23.92%

1Y

-27.52%

5Y*

4.12%

10Y*

0.63%

RING

YTD

50.59%

1M

12.22%

6M

33.03%

1Y

51.58%

5Y*

9.64%

10Y*

11.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NEEGX vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEEGX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NEEGX vs. RING — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEEGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NEEGX is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NEEGX is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NEEGX is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NEEGX is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NEEGX is 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NEEGX is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

RING
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RING is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RING is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RING is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RING is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RING is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RING is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NEEGX vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NEEGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the RING Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEEGX and RING, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NEEGX vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

NEEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than RING's 0.95% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
4.75%3.92%0.00%1.78%6.92%5.73%11.31%17.79%9.70%4.22%6.74%6.67%
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
0.95%1.43%2.01%2.29%2.38%0.82%0.83%0.70%0.42%1.42%0.97%0.85%

Drawdowns

NEEGX vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEEGX drawdown since its inception was -60.83%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEEGX and RING. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NEEGX vs. RING - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...