NEEGX vs. RING
Compare and contrast key facts about Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING).
NEEGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on Jan 2, 1996. RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012.
Performance
NEEGX vs. RING - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NEEGX vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 15.68% | 8.76% | 14.45% | 26.85% | -33.57% | 27.63% | 41.73% | 42.33% | -10.56% | 8.33% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 12.19% | 164.72% | 15.98% | 12.29% | -15.40% | -7.46% | 24.98% | 49.92% | -13.14% | 10.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEEGX achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than RING's 12.19% return. Over the past 10 years, NEEGX has underperformed RING with an annualized return of 12.74%, while RING has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.
NEEGX
- 1D
- 4.73%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 6M
- 17.81%
- 1Y
- 49.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
RING
- 1D
- 4.61%
- 1M
- -16.59%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 6M
- 26.66%
- 1Y
- 117.81%
- 3Y*
- 50.83%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NEEGX vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEEGX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NEEGX vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank
NEEGX
RING
NEEGX vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEEGX | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 2.53 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | 2.66 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.39 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.91 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.67 | 13.93 | -3.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEEGX | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.53 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.73 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.50 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.13 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between NEEGX and RING is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NEEGX vs. RING - Dividend Comparison
NEEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than RING's 0.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 6.54% | 7.57% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 6.92% | 5.73% | 11.31% | 17.79% | 9.70% | 4.22% | 6.74% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 0.75% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
NEEGX vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEEGX drawdown since its inception was -53.60%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEEGX and RING.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEEGX | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.60% | -79.47% | +25.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.15% | -30.11% | +14.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.35% | -47.94% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | -52.04% | +8.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.54% | -16.90% | +9.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.95% | -47.74% | +36.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 8.45% | -3.84% |
Volatility
NEEGX vs. RING - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) is 11.31%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that NEEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NEEGX | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.31% | 16.89% | -5.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.91% | 38.80% | -17.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.23% | 46.82% | -14.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.04% | 35.87% | -7.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.01% | 36.87% | -11.86% |