NEAGX vs. IMCG
Compare and contrast key facts about Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG).
NEAGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on Sep 4, 2001. IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004.
Performance
NEAGX vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NEAGX vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 11.92% | 26.40% | 14.31% | 37.65% | -27.53% | 37.56% | 51.53% | 43.82% | -16.09% | 8.75% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.05% | 6.55% | 18.14% | 20.73% | -25.79% | 15.39% | 45.64% | 35.70% | -3.68% | 25.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEAGX achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than IMCG's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, NEAGX has outperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 18.04%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.72% annualized return.
NEAGX
- 1D
- 4.33%
- 1M
- -7.75%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 60.51%
- 3Y*
- 26.85%
- 5Y*
- 15.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.04%
IMCG
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- -2.78%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NEAGX vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEAGX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NEAGX vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank
NEAGX
IMCG
NEAGX vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEAGX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 0.58 | +1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | 0.97 | +1.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.13 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.27 | 0.97 | +3.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.19 | 3.96 | +11.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEAGX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 0.58 | +1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.27 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.62 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.50 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between NEAGX and IMCG is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NEAGX vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison
NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than IMCG's 0.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 1.91% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.10% | 3.91% | 10.64% | 16.57% | 5.17% | 6.72% | 11.88% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.79% | 0.78% | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
NEAGX vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEAGX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAGX and IMCG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEAGX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.80% | -58.96% | +17.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -12.99% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.31% | -35.08% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | -35.08% | -1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.75% | -5.73% | -2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.72% | -9.29% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 3.16% | +0.77% |
Volatility
NEAGX vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) at 7.19%. This indicates that NEAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NEAGX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.64% | 7.19% | +4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.84% | 12.15% | +7.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.93% | 20.30% | +8.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 20.09% | +4.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 20.44% | +3.46% |