NDQ.AX vs. MOAT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NDQ.AX (BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDQ.AX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NDQ.AX returned 22.56%/yr vs 14.67%/yr for MOAT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NDQ.AX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.

Performance

NDQ.AX vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

NDQ.AX is traded in AUD, while MOAT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MOAT values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDQ.AX achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -4.59% return. Over the past 10 years, NDQ.AX has outperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 22.56%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.67% annualized return.

NDQ.AX

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: 13.57%
• 6M: 13.08%
• 1Y: 26.83%
• 3Y*: 24.61%
• 5Y*: 18.03%
• 10Y*: 22.56%

MOAT

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: -4.59%
• 6M: -5.18%
• 1Y: 5.33%
• 3Y*: 9.55%
• 5Y*: 9.93%
• 10Y*: 14.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDQ.AX vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NDQ.AX BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF	13.57%	11.35%	38.19%	53.22%	-28.42%	35.46%	34.50%	39.66%	8.97%	21.59%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-4.59%	4.98%	21.88%	31.99%	-7.95%	31.40%	4.75%	35.42%	9.30%	13.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NDQ.AX and MOAT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2015	0.09

Return for Risk

NDQ.AX vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDQ.AX

NDQ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 47
NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
NDQ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NDQ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
NDQ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
NDQ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 24
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDQ.AX vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NDQ.AX	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	0.41	+1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	0.69	+1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.08	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	0.36	+1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.23	0.75	+3.48

NDQ.AX vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDQ.AX and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NDQ.AX vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDQ.AX drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDQ.AX and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDQ.AX	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.79%	-24.17%	-6.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-14.76%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.27%	-19.24%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.79%	-19.24%	-11.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.79%	-24.17%	-6.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-7.88%	+7.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.87%	-3.57%	-2.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.05%	7.12%	-1.07%

Volatility

NDQ.AX vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 3.95%. This indicates that NDQ.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDQ.AX	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	3.95%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.81%	9.94%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.52%	12.94%	+1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.07%	15.73%	+3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.10%	16.84%	+2.26%

NDQ.AX vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDQ.AX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDQ.AX vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

NDQ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than MOAT's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.37%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%
NDQ.AX BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.77%	0.93%	1.81%	2.09%	3.36%	3.33%	2.47%	2.22%	0.37%	0.25%	0.40%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDQ.AX and MOAT in my portfolio?

NDQ.AX and MOAT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NDQ.AX or MOAT?

On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDQ.AX or MOAT?

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for NDQ.AX.

What is the main difference between NDQ.AX and MOAT?

NDQ.AX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. NDQ.AX tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for NDQ.AX and 0.47% for MOAT.