NDIV vs. FNGU
Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).
NDIV and FNGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NDIV is a passively managed fund by Amplify Investments that tracks the performance of the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index. It was launched on Aug 24, 2022. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. Both NDIV and FNGU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NDIV or FNGU.
Correlation
The correlation between NDIV and FNGU is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
NDIV vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NDIV:
1.36
FNGU:
1.45
NDIV:
1.81
FNGU:
1.94
NDIV:
1.23
FNGU:
1.26
NDIV:
1.97
FNGU:
2.27
NDIV:
6.21
FNGU:
6.01
NDIV:
3.13%
FNGU:
17.81%
NDIV:
14.19%
FNGU:
74.13%
NDIV:
-16.41%
FNGU:
-92.34%
NDIV:
-2.28%
FNGU:
-3.02%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDIV achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 15.49% return.
NDIV
7.28%
-0.56%
6.30%
15.99%
N/A
N/A
FNGU
15.49%
12.90%
57.72%
112.69%
43.86%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NDIV vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDIV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NDIV vs. FNGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NDIV
FNGU
NDIV vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NDIV vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 5.51% | 5.88% | 7.37% | 1.70% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NDIV vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NDIV vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) is 5.06%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 20.80%. This indicates that NDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.